首页> 外文期刊>Water >Water Property Models as Sovereignty Prerogatives: European Legal Perspectives in Comparison
【24h】

Water Property Models as Sovereignty Prerogatives: European Legal Perspectives in Comparison

机译:作为主权特权的水产权模型:比较中的欧洲法律观点

获取原文
           

摘要

Water resources in European legal systems have always been vested in sovereign power, regardless of their legal nature as goods vested in State property or as res communes omnium not subject to ownership. The common legal foundation of sovereign power over water resources departed once civil law jurisdictions leveled the demesne on ownership model, by introducing public ownership in the French codification of 1804, while common law jurisdiction developed a broader legal concept of property that includes even the rights to use res communes. The models led respectively to the establishment of administrative systems of water rights and markets of water rights. According to the first, public authorities’ power to manage and preserve water resources is grounded in a derogatory regime, whereby water rights, grounded on licenses or concessions, are neither transferable nor tradeable. On the contrary, environmental and social concerns in water market schemes must be enforced by means of regulation, thus limiting private property rights on water, in compliance with the constitutional and common law constraints set out to protect the minimum content of property as a fundamental human right.
机译:欧洲法律体系中的水资源一直归主权所有,无论其法律性质是归国家所有,还是作为不受所有权约束的社区。一旦民法司法管辖区通过在1804年法国法典中引入公有制而将所有权归属定为所有权模型之后,主权对水资源的普通法律基础就消失了,而普通法司法管辖区则建立了更广泛的财产法律概念,甚至包括对使用社区。这些模型分别导致建立了水权管理制度和水权市场。根据第一个观点,公共当局管理和保护水资源的权力是基于一种贬损性制度,在这种制度中,基于许可或特许权的水权既不可转让也不可交易。相反,水市场计划中的环境和社会问题必须通过监管手段来执行,从而限制水的私有财产权,并遵守为保护基本财产而保护财产的最低限度的宪法和普通法约束。对。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号