首页> 外文期刊>Water >Comparative Studies of Different Imputation Methods for Recovering Streamflow Observation
【24h】

Comparative Studies of Different Imputation Methods for Recovering Streamflow Observation

机译:不同插补方法恢复水流观测值的比较研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Faulty field sensors cause unreliability in the observed data that needed to calibrate and assess hydrology models. However, it is illogical to ignore abnormal or missing values if there are limited data available. This study addressed this problem by applying data imputation to replace incorrect values and recover missing streamflow information in the dataset of the Samho gauging station at Taehwa River (TR), Korea from 2004 to 2006. Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) and two machine learning techniques, Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and Self Organizing Map (SOM), were employed to estimate streamflow using reasonable flow datasets of Samho station from 2004 to 2009. The machine learning models were generally better at capturing high flows, while SWAT was better at simulating low flows.
机译:有故障的现场传感器导致校准和评估水文模型所需的观测数据不可靠。但是,如果可用数据有限,则忽略异常值或缺失值是不合逻辑的。这项研究通过应用数据插补来替换不正确的值并恢复2004年至2006年韩国Taehwa河(TR)的Samho监测站的数据集中的流失信息来解决此问题。土壤和水评估工具(SWAT)和两台机器使用2004年至2009年的Samho站的合理流量数据集,使用人工神经网络(ANN)和自组织图(SOM)等学习技术来估算流量。机器学习模型通常更擅长捕获高流量,而SWAT则更好模拟低流量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号