首页> 外文期刊>Trials >The ideal time of systemic metronidazole and amoxicillin administration in the treatment of severe periodontitis: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
【24h】

The ideal time of systemic metronidazole and amoxicillin administration in the treatment of severe periodontitis: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

机译:系统性甲硝唑和阿莫西林给药治疗严重牙周炎的理想时间:一项随机对照试验的研究方案

获取原文
           

摘要

The combination of systemic metronidazole (MTZ) and amoxicillin (AMX) with scaling and root planing (SRP) has shown to be an effective periodontal treatment. However, some essential issues associated with the use of these antibiotics remain unanswered, such as the ideal time of administration during the course of periodontal treatment. Although these agents are often prescribed after the healing phase of the SRP procedure, there is biological plausibility to support its use in conjunction with the mechanical treatment. However, to date, no placebo controlled randomized clinical trial (RCT) has directly compared these two protocols. Therefore, the aim of this RCT is to compare the clinical, microbiological and immunological effects of the adjunctive systemic MTZ + AMX administered in different phases of the treatment of severe periodontitis. Subjects with severe periodontitis (n = 180) are being randomly assigned into three groups (n = 60/group): (i) SRP-only (control group), SRP in combination with 400 mg MTZ + 500 mg AMX, starting (ii) at the first SRP session (active phase group), or (iii) after 3 months of its completion (healing phase group). All volunteers are receiving clinical and microbiological evaluation at baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months, and immunological assessment at baseline and 12 months post-therapy. Nine subgingival biofilm samples are being collected per subject and analyzed for counts and proportions of 40 bacterial species by checkerboard DNA-DNA hybridization, and six gingival crevicular fluid samples are being collected and analyzed for the levels of 20 chemokines by multiplex immunoassay. The primary outcome variable is the number of volunteers reaching the clinical endpoint for treatment (≤?4 sites with probing depth ≥5 mm) at 1 year post-therapy. Differences in clinical, microbiological and immunological parameters among groups and over time will be evaluated using analysis of variance, analysis of covariance and the Chi-square and Tukey tests. Microbiological and immunological analyses will be performed using adjustments for multiple comparisons. Statistical significance will be set at 5%. ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT02954393 . Registered on 3 November 2016.
机译:全身性甲硝唑(MTZ)和阿莫西林(AMX)与结垢和牙根整平(SRP)的结合已被证明是一种有效的牙周治疗。但是,与使用这些抗生素有关的一些基本问题仍未得到解答,例如在牙周治疗过程中理想的给药时间。尽管这些药物通常在SRP程序的康复阶段之后开出处方,但仍存在生物学上的合理性以支持其与机械治疗结合使用。但是,迄今为止,尚无安慰剂对照的随机临床试验(RCT)直接比较这两种方案。因此,该RCT的目的是比较在严重牙周炎治疗的不同阶段给予的全身性MTZ + AMX辅助治疗的临床,微生物学和免疫学效果。将患有严重牙周炎的患者(n = 180)随机分为三组(n = 60 /组):(i)仅SRP(对照组),SRP联合400 mg MTZ + 500 mg AMX,开始(ii )(在第一个SRP会话中)(活动阶段组),或(iii)在完成三个月后(康复阶段组)。所有志愿者均在基线,治疗后3、6和12个月接受临床和微生物学评估,并在基线和治疗后12个月接受免疫学评估。每个受试者收集9个龈下生物膜样品,并通过棋盘DNA-DNA杂交分析40种细菌的数量和比例,并收集6个龈沟液样品,并通过多重免疫测定分析20种趋化因子的水平。主要结局变量是治疗后1年达到临床终点(≤4个部位,探查深度≥5mm)的志愿者人数。将使用方差分析,协方差分析以及卡方检验和Tukey检验来评估各组之间以及随时间推移的临床,微生物学和免疫学参数的差异。微生物和免疫学分析将通过调整进行多次比较。统计显着性将设置为5%。 ClinicalTrials.gov,NCT02954393。 2016年11月3日注册。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号