...
首页> 外文期刊>Trials >Efficacy of an educational intervention in primary health care in inhalation techniques: study protocol for a pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial
【24h】

Efficacy of an educational intervention in primary health care in inhalation techniques: study protocol for a pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial

机译:吸入技术对初级卫生保健的教育干预的功效:实用的整群随机对照试验的研究方案

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) accounts for 10–12?% of primary care consultations, 7?% of hospital admissions and 35?% of chronic incapacity related to productivity. The misuse of inhalers is a significant problem in COPD because it is associated with reduced therapeutic drug effects leading to lack of control of both symptoms and disease. Despite all advice, health care professionals’ practice management of inhalation treatments is usually deficient. Interventions to improve inhaler technique by health care professionals are limited, especially among primary care professionals, who provide the most care to patients with COPD. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of an educational intervention to train general practitioners (GPs) in the right inhalation technique for the most commonly used inhalers. Methods/design We are conducting a pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial. The sample population is composed of 267 patients diagnosed with COPD using inhalation therapy selected from among those in 20 general practices, divided into two groups (control and intervention) by block randomisation at 8 primary care centres. The sample has two levels. The first level is patients with COPD who agree to participate in the trial and receive the educational intervention from their GPs. The second level is GPs who are primary health care professionals and receive the educational intervention. The intervention is one session of the educational intervention with a monitor given to GPs for training in the right inhalation technique. The primary outcome is correct inhalation technique in patients. Secondary outcomes are functional status (spirometry) and quality of life. The follow-up period will be 1?year. GPs will have two visits (baseline and at the 1-year follow-up visit. Patients will have four visits (at baseline and 3, 6 and 12?months). Analysis will be done on an intention-to-treat basis. Discussion We carried out three previous clinical trials in patients with COPD, which showed the efficacy of an educational intervention based on monitor training to improve the inhalation technique in patients. This intervention is suitable and feasible in the context of clinical practice. Now we are seeking to know if we can improve it when the monitor is the GP (the real care provider in daily practise). Trial registration ISRCTN Registry identifier ISRCTN93725230 . Registered on 18 August 2014.
机译:背景慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)占基层医疗咨询的10–12%,住院收治的7%和与生产力相关的慢性无能行为的35%。吸入器的滥用是COPD中的一个重要问题,因为它与治疗药物作用降低有关,导致对症状和疾病的控制均缺乏。尽管有所有建议,但医疗保健专业人员的吸入治疗实践管理通常不足。卫生保健专业人员改善吸入器技术的干预措施是有限的,尤其是在初级保健专业人员中,他们为COPD患者提供最多的护理。这项研究的目的是评估一种教育干预措施的有效性,该干预措施针对最常用的吸入器,以正确的吸入技术对全科医生进行培训。方法/设计我们正在进行一项实用的整群随机对照试验。样本人群由267例使用吸入疗法诊断为COPD的患者组成,这些患者选自20种常规实践中的患者,通过在8个初级护理中心进行区组随机分组而分为两组(对照组和干预组)。该样本有两个级别。第一级是COPD患者,他们同意参加试验并接受其全科医生的教育干预。第二级是作为初级卫生保健专业人员并接受教育干预的全科医生。干预措施是教育干预措施的一个环节,监督人员会向全科医生提供正确的吸入技术培训。主要结果是正确的患者吸入技术。次要结果是功能状态(肺活量测定)和生活质量。随访期为1年。全科医生将进行两次就诊(基线和1年随访)。患者将进行4次就诊(在基线以及3、6和12个月),分析将按意向进行。我们在COPD患者中进行了三项临床试验,结果表明,基于监护仪培训进行教育干预以改善患者吸入技术的有效性,这种干预在临床实践中是合适且可行的。知道当监护人是全科医生(日常工作中的真正护理提供者)时,我们是否可以改善它。试用注册ISRCTN注册管理机构标识符ISRCTN93725230。2014年8月18日注册。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号