...
首页> 外文期刊>Trials >Comparing endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) versus fine needle biopsy (FNB) in the diagnosis of solid lesions: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
【24h】

Comparing endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) versus fine needle biopsy (FNB) in the diagnosis of solid lesions: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

机译:内镜超声(EUS)引导的细针穿刺(FNA)与细针活检(FNB)在实体病变诊断中的比较:一项随机对照试验的研究方案

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background Linear endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) allows the visualization, identification, and characterization of the extent of lesions of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract and adjacent structures. EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) facilitates a more accurate diagnosis of mediastinal, intra-abdominal, and pancreatic lesions through the collection of the cytological material under direct visualization. Recent reports suggest that histological samples can be obtained by EUS-FNA with a reverse, bevel-tipped needle (the ProCore needle) to collect the core samples (fine needle biopsy, FNB), thereby adding a new dimension to the diagnostic usefulness of this technique. Certain neoplasms, such as lymphoma and stromal tumors, can be assessed by EUS-FNB to confirm the diagnosis. Here, we aimed to carry out a prospective, multicenter, single-blind, randomized, controlled trial to compare EUS-FNB and EUS-FNA. Methods/design A total of 408 patients will be enrolled from five endoscopic centers. Patients will be divided into two groups: (1) group A, which is the EUS regular needle group (EUS-FNA) and (2) group B, which is the EUS ProCore needle group (EUS-FNB). Patients in group A will be examined with a 22G EchoTip Ultra needle, and patients in group B, with a 22G EchoTip ProCore needle. For all included patients, four EUS-guided passes will be made in each lesion. In the first and second pass, a slow-pull suction method of the stylet will be done. The third and fourth pass will use manual suction of 5?cc. The primary objective is to compare the diagnostic yield of malignancy by EUS-FNA versus EUS-FNB. Discussion The trial will compare samples obtained by EUS-FNA versus EUS-FNB for the diagnostic yield of solid lesions. The efficacy of these two sampling methods will be assessed on various lesions, which may provide insights into developing practice guidelines for their future indications. Trial registration Clinical Trials.gov, NCT02327065 .
机译:背景技术线性内窥镜超声检查(EUS)可以可视化,识别和表征胃肠道(GI)和邻近结构的病变程度。 EUS引导的细针穿刺术(EUS-FNA)通过在直接可视化下收集细胞学材料,有助于更准确地诊断纵隔,腹内和胰腺病变。最近的报告表明,EUS-FNA可以使用倒角,倒角的针头(ProCore针头)收集组织学样本,以收集核心样本(细针穿刺活检,FNB),从而为这种方法的诊断实用性增加了新的维度。技术。 EUS-FNB可以评估某些肿瘤,例如淋巴瘤和间质瘤,以确诊。在这里,我们旨在开展一项前瞻性,多中心,单盲,随机对照试验,以比较EUS-FNB和EUS-FNA。方法/设计将从五个内窥镜中心招募408名患者。患者将分为两组:(1)A组,即EUS常规针头组(EUS-FNA)和(2)B组,即EUS ProCore针头组(EUS-FNB)。 A组患者将使用22G EchoTip Ultra针进行检查,B组患者将使用22G EchoTip ProCore针进行检查。对于所有纳入的患者,每个病变将进行四次EUS引导的通行证。在第一遍和第二遍中,将完成探针的慢速抽吸方法。第三和第四遍将使用5?cc的手动吸力。主要目的是比较EUS-FNA与EUS-FNB的恶性诊断率。讨论该试验将比较通过EUS-FNA和EUS-FNB获得的样品对实体病变的诊断率。这两种采样方法的功效将在各种病变上进行评估,这可能为深入了解其未来适应症的实践指南提供见识。试用注册Clinical Trials.gov,NCT02327065。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号