首页> 外文期刊>Trials >Preventing recurrence of endometriosis by means of long-acting progestogen therapy (PRE-EMPT): report of an internal pilot, multi-arm, randomised controlled trial incorporating flexible entry design and adaption of design based on feasibility of recruitment
【24h】

Preventing recurrence of endometriosis by means of long-acting progestogen therapy (PRE-EMPT): report of an internal pilot, multi-arm, randomised controlled trial incorporating flexible entry design and adaption of design based on feasibility of recruitment

机译:通过长效孕激素治疗(PRE-EMPT)预防子宫内膜异位症的复发:一项内部试验,多组随机对照试验的报告,该试验结合了灵活的进入设计和基于募集可行性的设计适应性

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Endometriosis is associated with the growth of endometrium in ectopic sites mainly within the pelvis. This results in inflammation and scarring, causing pain and impaired quality of life. Endometriotic lesions can be excised or ablated surgically, but the risk of recurrence is high. A Heath Technology Assessment commissioning call in 2011 sought applications for trials aimed at evaluating long-term effectiveness of postoperative, long-acting, reversible contraceptives (LARCs) in preventing recurrence of endometriosis. A survey of gynaecologists indicated that there was no consensus about which LARC (Levonorgestrel Intrauterine System (LNG-IUS) or depot medroxyprogesterone acetate injection (DMPA)) or comparator (combined oral contraceptive pill (COCP) or no treatment) should be evaluated. Hence, we designed a ‘flexible-entry’ internal pilot to assess whether a four-arm trial was feasible including a possible design adaption based on pilot findings. Methods In this pilot, women could be randomised to two, three or four treatment options provided that one was a LARC and one was a non-LARC. An assessment of feasibility based on recruitment to these options and a revised substantive trial design was considered by an independent oversight committee. Results The study ran for 1 year from April 2014 and 77 women were randomised. Only 5 (6%) women accepted randomisation to all groups, with 63 (82%) having a LARC preference and 55 (71%) a non-LARC preference. Four-way and three-way designs were ruled out with a two-way LARC versus COCP design, stratified by prerandomisation choice of LARC and optional subrandomisation to LNG-IUS versus DMPA considered a feasible substantive study. Conclusions Multi-arm studies are potentially efficient as they can answer multiple questions simultaneously but are difficult to recruit to if there are strong patient or clinician preferences. A flexible approach to randomisation in a pilot phase can be used to assess feasibility of such studies and modify a trial design based on chosen recruitment options, but trialists should consider carefully any practical arrangements should groups need to be dropped during a study. Trial registration International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number, ISRCTN97865475 . Registered on 20 March 2014.
机译:背景子宫内膜异位症主要与骨盆内异位部位的子宫内膜生长有关。这会导致发炎和疤痕形成,从而导致疼痛和生活质量下降。子宫内膜异位病变可通过手术切除或消融,但复发的风险很高。在2011年进行的一项“健康技术评估”委托电话中,寻求旨在评估术后长效可逆避孕药(LARC)预防子宫内膜异位症复发的长期有效性的试验申请。妇科医生的一项调查表明,对于应该评估哪种LARC(左炔诺孕酮宫内注射系统(LNG-IUS)或醋酸甲羟孕酮注射液(DMPA))或对照品(联合口服避孕药(COCP)或不进行治疗)尚无共识。因此,我们设计了一个“灵活进入”内部飞行员,以评估四臂试验是否可行,包括根据飞行员的发现进行可能的设计调整。方法在该试验中,妇女可以随机分为两种,三种或四种治疗方案,条件是一种是LARC,一种是非LARC。一个独立的监督委员会考虑了基于对这些方案的征聘和经修订的实质性试验设计的可行性评估。结果该研究从2014年4月开始进行了1年,随机抽取了77名妇女。只有5(6%)名妇女接受了所有组的随机分组,其中63名(82%)有LARC优惠,而55名(71%)非LARC优惠。通过双向LARC与COCP设计,排除了四向和三向设计,通过对LARC进行预随机化选择和将LNG-IUS与DMPA进行可选的亚随机化进行分层,认为这是可行的实质性研究。结论多臂研究可能有效,因为它们可以同时回答多个问题,但是如果患者或临床医生有强烈的偏爱,则很难招募。在试验阶段可以采用灵活的随机方法来评估此类研究的可行性,并根据选择的招募方案修改试验设计,但是试验者应仔细考虑任何可行的安排,以免在研究期间应放弃小组。试用注册国际标准随机对照试验编号ISRCTN97865475。 2014年3月20日注册。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号