首页> 外文期刊>Trials >Treatment of the humeral shaft fractures - minimally invasive osteosynthesis with bridge plate versus conservative treatment with functional brace: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
【24h】

Treatment of the humeral shaft fractures - minimally invasive osteosynthesis with bridge plate versus conservative treatment with functional brace: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

机译:肱骨干骨折的治疗-桥板微创接骨术与功能性支具保守治疗:一项随机对照试验的研究方案

获取原文
       

摘要

Background Humeral shaft fractures account for 1 to 3% of all fractures in adults and for 20% of all humeral fractures. Non-operative treatment is still the standard treatment of isolated humeral shaft fractures, although this method can present unsatisfactory results. Surgical treatment is reserved for specific conditions. Modern concepts of internal fixation of long bone shaft fractures advocate relative stabilisation techniques with no harm to fracture zone. Recently described, minimally invasive bridge plate osteosynthesis has been shown to be a secure technique with good results for treating humeral shaft fractures. There is no good quality evidence advocating which method is more effective. This randomised controlled trial will be performed to investigate the effectiveness of surgical treatment of humeral shaft fractures with bridge plating in comparison with conservative treatment with functional brace. Methods/Design This randomised clinical trial aims to include 110 patients with humeral shaft fractures who will be allocated after randomisation to one of the two groups: bridge plate or functional brace. Surgical treatment will be performed according to technique described by Livani and Belangero using a narrow DCP plate. Non-operative management will consist of a functional brace for 6 weeks or until fracture consolidation. All patients will be included in the same rehabilitation program and will be followed up for 1 year after intervention. The primary outcome will be the DASH score after 6 months of intervention. As secondary outcomes, we will assess SF-36 questionnaire, treatment complications, Constant score, pain (Visual Analogue Scale) and radiographs. Discussion According to current evidence shown in a recent systematic review, this study is one of the first randomised controlled trials designed to compare two methods to treat humeral shaft fractures (functional brace and bridge plate surgery). Trial registration Current Controlled Trials: ISRCTN24835397
机译:背景肱骨干骨折占成人骨折总数的1%至3%,占肱骨骨折总数的20%。非手术治疗仍是孤立的肱骨干骨折的标准治疗方法,尽管这种方法可能无法令人满意。保留针对特定情况的手术治疗。现代长骨干骨折内固定的概念主张采用相对稳定的技术,而不会损害骨折区域。最近描述,微创桥板骨固定术已被证明是一种安全的技术,具有很好的治疗肱骨干骨折的效果。没有高质量的证据支持哪种方法更有效。将进行这项随机对照试验,以调查采用桥钢板进行手术治疗肱骨干骨折与保守治疗功能性支具相比的有效性。方法/设计这项随机临床试验旨在纳入110例肱骨干骨折患者,他们将被随机分配至以下两组之一:桥板或功能性支具。手术治疗将根据Livani和Belangero所述的技术,使用狭窄的DCP板进行。非手术治疗包括6周或直到骨折巩固之前的功能性支撑。所有患者将被纳入同一个康复计划,并在干预后随访1年。主要结果将是干预6个月后的DASH评分。作为次要结果,我们将评估SF-36问卷,治疗并发症,恒定评分,疼痛(视觉模拟量表)和X线照片。讨论根据最近的系统评价中显示的当前证据,该研究是旨在比较两种治疗肱骨干骨折(功能性支架和桥板手术)的方法的首批随机对照试验之一。试用注册当前控制的试用:ISRCTN24835397

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号