首页> 外文期刊>Trials >Sample size requirements to estimate key design parameters from external pilot randomised controlled trials: a simulation study
【24h】

Sample size requirements to estimate key design parameters from external pilot randomised controlled trials: a simulation study

机译:通过外部试点随机对照试验估算关键设计参数的样本量要求:模拟研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Background External pilot or feasibility studies can be used to estimate key unknown parameters to inform the design of the definitive randomised controlled trial (RCT). However, there is little consensus on how large pilot studies need to be, and some suggest inflating estimates to adjust for the lack of precision when planning the definitive RCT. Methods We use a simulation approach to illustrate the sampling distribution of the standard deviation for continuous outcomes and the event rate for binary outcomes. We present the impact of increasing the pilot sample size on the precision and bias of these estimates, and predicted power under three realistic scenarios. We also illustrate the consequences of using a confidence interval argument to inflate estimates so the required power is achieved with a pre-specified level of confidence. We limit our attention to external pilot and feasibility studies prior to a two-parallel-balanced-group superiority RCT. Results For normally distributed outcomes, the relative gain in precision of the pooled standard deviation (SDp) is less than 10% (for each five subjects added per group) once the total sample size is 70. For true proportions between 0.1 and 0.5, we find the gain in precision for each five subjects added to the pilot sample is less than 5% once the sample size is 60. Adjusting the required sample sizes for the imprecision in the pilot study estimates can result in excessively large definitive RCTs and also requires a pilot sample size of 60 to 90 for the true effect sizes considered here. Conclusions We recommend that an external pilot study has at least 70 measured subjects (35 per group) when estimating the SDp for a continuous outcome. If the event rate in an intervention group needs to be estimated by the pilot then a total of 60 to 100 subjects is required. Hence if the primary outcome is binary a total of at least 120 subjects (60 in each group) may be required in the pilot trial. It is very much more efficient to use a larger pilot study, than to guard against the lack of precision by using inflated estimates.
机译:背景技术外部试验或可行性研究可用于估算关键的未知参数,以指导确定性随机对照试验(RCT)的设计。但是,对于需要进行多少大型试点研究尚无共识,有人建议在确定最终的RCT时夸大估计以适应缺乏精确性的情况。方法我们使用一种模拟方法来说明连续结果的标准偏差和二元结果的事件发生率的抽样分布。我们介绍了在三种实际情况下,增加试点样本数量对这些估计的精度和偏差以及预测功效的影响。我们还说明了使用置信区间参数对估计值进行膨胀的后果,以便以预先指定的置信度来获得所需的功效。在进行两个平行平衡组优势RCT之前,我们将注意力集中在外部试点和可行性研究上。结果对于正态分布的结果,一旦总样本量为70,则合并标准偏差(SD p )的精确度的相对增益小于10%(对于每组每增加五个受试者)。如果真实比例在0.1到0.5之间,则我们发现,一旦样本量为60,添加到试验样本中的每五个对象的精度增益就小于5%。调整试验研究估计中不精确度所需的样本量可以得出:最终RCT太大,并且对于此处考虑的真实效果大小,还需要60至90的试验样本大小。结论我们建议在进行外部连续性研究时,至少要评估70名被测者(每组35名),以估计SD p 的持续结果。如果飞行员需要估计干预组中的事件发生率,则总共需要60至100名受试者。因此,如果主要结果是二进制的,那么在试验试验中可能至少需要120位受试者(每组60位)。使用较大的先导研究比通过使用夸大的估计来防止缺乏精确性要有效得多。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号