...
首页> 外文期刊>Trials >Evaluation of wet-cupping therapy for persistent non-specific low back pain: a randomised, waiting-list controlled, open-label, parallel-group pilot trial
【24h】

Evaluation of wet-cupping therapy for persistent non-specific low back pain: a randomised, waiting-list controlled, open-label, parallel-group pilot trial

机译:湿杯疗法对持续性非特异性下腰痛的评估:一项随机,等待清单控制,开放标签,平行分组的试验性研究

获取原文

摘要

Background Persistent non-specific low back pain (PNSLBP) is one of the most frequently experienced types of back pain around the world. Wet-cupping is a common intervention for various pain conditions, especially in Korea. In this context, we conducted a pilot study to determine the effectiveness and safety of wet-cupping treatment for PNSLBP. Methods We recruited 32 participants (21 in the wet-cupping group and 11 in the waiting-list group) who had been having PNSLBP for at least 3 months. The participants were recruited at the clinical research centre of the Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine, Korea. Eligible participants were randomly allocated to wet-cupping and waiting-list groups. Following the practice of traditional Korean medicine, the treatment group was provided with wet-cupping treatment at two acupuncture points among the BL23, BL24 and BL25 6 times within 2 weeks. Usual care, including providing brochures for exercise, general advice for PNSLBP and acetaminophen, was allowed in both groups. Separate assessors participated in the outcome assessment. We used the 0 to100 numerical rating scale (NRS) for pain, the McGill Pain Questionnaire for pain intensity (PPI) and the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (ODQ), and we assessed acetaminophen use and safety issues. Results The results showed that the NRS score for pain decreased (-16.0 [95% CI: -24.4 to -7.7] in the wet-cupping group and -9.1 [-18.1 to -0.1] in the waiting-list group), but there was no statistical difference between the groups (p = 0.52). However, the PPI scores showed significant differences between the two groups (-1.2 [-1.6 to -0.8] for the wet-cupping group and -0.2 [-0.8 to 0.4] for the waiting-list group, p Conclusion This pilot study may provide preliminary data on the effectiveness and safety of wet-cupping treatments for PNSLBP. Future full-scale randomised controlled trials will be needed to provide firm evidence of the effectiveness of this intervention. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov: (Identifier: NCT00925951 ) Date of trial registration: June 19th, 2009 The date when the first patient was randomised: July 15th, 2009 The date when the study was completed: November 27th, 2009
机译:背景技术持续性非特异性下背痛(PNSLBP)是世界上最常出现的背痛类型之一。湿拔罐是多种疼痛状况的常见干预措施,尤其是在韩国。在这种情况下,我们进行了一项初步研究,以确定PNSLBP湿杯治疗的有效性和安全性。方法我们招募了至少3个月患有PNSLBP的32名参与者(湿杯组21名,等候名单组11名)。参加者是在韩国韩国东方医学研究所临床研究中心招募的。符合条件的参与者被随机分配到湿杯和等待名单组。遵照韩国传统医学,治疗组在2周内在BL23,BL24和BL25中的两个穴位上进行了6次湿杯疗法。两组均允许进行常规护理,包括提供运动手册,PNSLBP和对乙酰氨基酚的一般建议。独立的评估人员参加了结果评估。我们使用0到100的数字评分表(NRS)进行疼痛评估,使用McGill疼痛问卷进行疼痛强度(PPI)和Oswestry残疾问卷(ODQ),并评估了对乙酰氨基酚的使用和安全性问题。结果结果表明,疼痛的NRS评分有所降低(湿杯组为-16.0 [95%CI:-24.4至-7.7],而等候组为-9.1 [-18.1至-0.1]),但两组之间无统计学差异(p = 0.52)。但是,PPI评分显示两组之间存在显着差异(湿杯组为-1.2 [-1.6至-0.8],而等候组为-0.2 [-0.8至0.4],p)结论结论提供有关PNSLBP湿杯法治疗的有效性和安全性的初步数据,将来需要进行全面的随机对照试验,以提供有力的证据证明该干预措施的有效性。Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov:(标识符:NCT00925951)试验注册:2009年6月19日,首位患者随机分组的日期:2009年7月15日,研究完成的日期:2009年11月27日

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号