...
首页> 外文期刊>Trials >Financial considerations in the conduct of multi-centre randomised controlled trials: evidence from a qualitative study
【24h】

Financial considerations in the conduct of multi-centre randomised controlled trials: evidence from a qualitative study

机译:进行多中心随机对照试验时的财务考虑:定性研究的证据

获取原文

摘要

Background Securing and managing finances for multicentre randomised controlled trials is a highly complex activity which is rarely considered in the research literature. This paper describes the process of financial negotiation and the impact of financial considerations in four UK multicentre trials. These trials had met, or were on schedule to meet, recruitment targets agreed with their public-sector funders. The trials were considered within a larger study examining factors which might be associated with trial recruitment (STEPS). Methods In-depth semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted in 2003–04 with 45 individuals with various responsibilities to one of the four trials. Interviewees were recruited through purposive and then snowball sampling. Interview transcripts were analysed with the assistance of the qualitative package Atlas-ti. Results The data suggest that the UK system of dividing funds into research, treatment and NHS support costs brought the trial teams into complicated negotiations with multiple funders. The divisions were somewhat malleable and the funding system was used differently in each trial. The fact that all funders had the potential to influence and shape the trials considered here was an important issue as the perspectives of applicants and funders could diverge. The extent and range of industry involvement in non-industry-led trials was striking. Three broad periods of financial work (foundation, maintenance, and resourcing completion) were identified. From development to completion of a trial, the trialists had to be resourceful and flexible, adapting to changing internal and external circumstances. In each period, trialists and collaborators could face changing costs and challenges. Each trial extended the recruitment period; three required funding extensions from MRC or HTA. Conclusion This study highlights complex financial aspects of planning and conducting trials, especially where multiple funders are involved. Recognition of the importance of financial stability and of the need for appropriate training in this area should be paralleled by further similar research with a broader range of trials, aimed at understanding and facilitating the conduct of clinical research.
机译:背景技术多中心随机对照试验的财务安全管理是一项非常复杂的活动,在研究文献中很少考虑。本文介绍了英国四项多中心试验中的财务谈判流程以及财务考虑因素的影响。这些试验已经达到或按计划实现了与公共部门出资者商定的招聘目标。在较大的研究中考虑了这些试验,研究了可能与试验招募(STEPS)相关的因素。方法2003年4月对45名承担四个试验职责之一的人进行了深入的半结构化电话采访。受访者是通过有针对性的,然后是滚雪球的方式招募的。在定性软件包Atlas-ti的帮助下,对采访记录进行了分析。结果数据表明,英国将资金划分为研究,治疗和NHS支持费用的系统使审判小组与多个资助者进行了复杂的谈判。各个部门具有一定的延展性,并且每次试验中使用的资金系统都不同。所有资助人都有可能影响和影响此处考虑的试验这一事实是一个重要问题,因为申请人和资助人的观点可能会有所不同。行业参与非行业主导的试验的程度和范围引人注目。确定了财务工作的三个主要时期(基础,维护和资源完成)。从开发到完成审判,审判人员必须足智多谋且灵活,以适应不断变化的内部和外部环境。在每个阶段,审判员和合作者都可能面临不断变化的成本和挑战。每项审判都延长了招募期限;来自MRC或HTA的三笔必要的资金扩展。结论本研究突出了计划和进行试验的复杂财务方面,尤其是在涉及多个资助者的情况下。认识到财务稳定的重要性和在这一领域需要适当培训的认识,应与进一步的类似研究同时进行更广泛的试验,以期理解和促进临床研究的进行。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号