...
首页> 外文期刊>Tropical Journal of Pharmaceutical Research >Comparative studies on the therapeutic and adverse effects of mirtazapine and fluoxetine in the treatment of adult depression
【24h】

Comparative studies on the therapeutic and adverse effects of mirtazapine and fluoxetine in the treatment of adult depression

机译:米氮平与氟西汀治疗成人抑郁症的不良反应比较研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Purpose: To evaluate comparatively the therapeutic and adverse effects of mirtazapine and fluoxetine for the management of adult depression. Methods: Adults (58) with depression admitted to the Neurology Department of Zaozhuang Municipal Hospital from August 2014 to July 2016 were randomly assigned to either mirtazapine group or fluoxetine group. Those in mirtazapine group were given mirtazapine while the fluoxetine group took fluoxetine. The patients were graded for Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD) and Treatment Emergent Symptoms Scale (TESS) scores before treatment and at weeks 2, 4, 6, and 8 post-treatment, with the aim of comparing therapeutic effects and adverse reactions to mirtazapine and fluoxetine. Results: The therapeutic effects seen in the two groups did not differ significantly (p 0.05), but mirtazapine had a slight advantage over fluoxetine. Effectiveness appeared after 2 weeks in the mirtazapine group, and 4 weeks in the other group. Moreover, there were significant differences in HAMD scores between the two groups after 2 and 4 weeks of treatment (p 0.05). However, there were significant differences in score between pretreatment and 8-week post-treatment scores (p 0.05). Mirtazapine group also had lower incidents of adverse reactions (sleepiness, dyspepsia, nausea, vomiting, excitation, and headache) than the fluoxetine group (p 0.05). Conclusion: Mirtazapine has similar effect as fluoxetine in the treatment of adult depression, but works faster, with low incidence of adverse reactions. Thus, it is a safer and quicker antidepressant for clinical application.
机译:目的:比较评价米氮平和氟西汀治疗成人抑郁症的疗效和不良反应。方法:2014年8月至2016年7月在枣庄市人民医院神经内科收治的抑郁症成人(58例)随机分为米氮平组或氟西汀组。米氮平组者给予米氮平,氟西汀组者给予氟西汀。在治疗前和治疗后第2、4、6和8周对患者进行汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)和治疗后突发症状量表(TESS)评分,以比较对米氮平和米氮平的治疗效果和不良反应氟西汀。结果:两组中观察到的治疗效果没有显着差异(p> 0.05),但米氮平比氟西汀稍有优势。米氮平组2周后出现疗效,另一组4周后出现疗效。此外,在治疗2周和4周后,两组之间的HAMD评分存在显着差异(p 0.05)。但是,治疗前和治疗后8周得分之间的得分存在显着差异(p <0.05)。米氮平组的不良反应(嗜睡,消化不良,恶心,呕吐,兴奋和头痛)的发生率也低于氟西汀组(p <0.05)。结论:米氮平在治疗成人抑郁症中的作用与氟西汀相似,但起效快,不良反应发生率低。因此,它是用于临床应用的更安全,更快速的抗抑郁药。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号