首页> 外文期刊>The Internet Journal of Emergency Medicine >Emergency Department Utilization: Characterization and Comparison of an Urban Elderly Minority and Non-Minority Population
【24h】

Emergency Department Utilization: Characterization and Comparison of an Urban Elderly Minority and Non-Minority Population

机译:急诊部门的利用:城市少数民族和非少数民族人口的特征与比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Emergency departments (ED) are common entry points for the healthcare system among elders. Statistics show higher ED utilization among minority elderly.Objectives: Characterize ED use by elderly minority as compared to non-minority elderly.Setting: Urban Academic EDMethods: Retrospective chart review and prospective telephone survey. Elderly patients were defined as age 65 years or older. Minority groups were defined using U.S. Bureau of Census classifications and included African American, American Indian, Asian, Latino, and Pacific Islander. Results: Three hundred and thirty-two elderly patient charts were reviewed of which 288 (86.7%) were for minority patients and 44 (13.3%) were for non-minority patients. The majority of patients were women (69%) with a mean age of 70.8 ± 6.1. There was a significant difference in the average patient age by race (p=0.008), with the mean age of Caucasians being the highest. A greater percentage of non-minority ED visits were triaged as urgent or emergent as compared with minority groups (79.5% vs. 59.7%, p=0.004) whereas minority patients had a higher incidence of non-urgent triage classifications (34.0% vs. 13.6%, p=0.005). There were no significant differences between the mean number of ED visits between minority and non-minority patients (p=0.40). Despite being Medicare-eligible, more minority patients indicated lack of insurance coverage as the primary reason for seeking emergency care. (p=0.003)Conclusion: Elderly minority patients tended to be slighter younger and seek care from EDs for less urgent conditions than non-minority elderly patients. Race and ethnicity did not appear to be important determinants of emergency departments use. However, these data suggest that interventions that could provide greater access to primary care and preventive services may favorably impact ED utilization among minority elderly. Further investigation into racial and ethnic disparities regarding insurance coverage despite near-universal coverage by Medicare among an elderly population is also warranted.
机译:背景:急诊科(ED)是老年人医疗保健系统的常见切入点。统计数据显示少数民族老年人的ED利用率较高。目标:表征少数民族老年人与非少数民族老年人的ED使用情况。背景:城市学术ED方法:回顾性图表审查和预期电话调查。老年患者定义为65岁以上。少数群体是使用美国人口普查局的分类来定义的,其中包括非裔美国人,美洲印第安人,亚洲人,拉丁美洲人和太平洋岛民。结果:回顾了332例老年患者图表,其中288例(86.7%)为少数民族患者,44例(13.3%)为非少数民族患者。大多数患者为女性(69%),平均年龄为70.8±6.1。按种族划分的平均患者年龄存在显着差异(p = 0.008),高加索人的平均年龄最高。与少数族裔相比,非少数族裔急诊就诊为紧急或急诊的比例更高(79.5%vs. 59.7%,p = 0.004),而少数族裔患者的非紧急性急诊分类发生率更高(34.0%vs. 13.6%,p = 0.005)。少数族裔和非少数族裔患者的ED访视平均次数之间无显着差异(p = 0.40)。尽管有医疗保险资格,但仍有更多少数族裔患者表示缺乏保险是寻求紧急护理的主要原因。 (p = 0.003)结论:与非少数族裔老年患者相比,少数族裔老年患者更年轻,并向急诊室寻求护理以减少紧急情况。种族和种族似乎并不是急诊部门使用的重要决定因素。但是,这些数据表明,可以提供更多机会获得初级保健和预防服务的干预措施可能会对少数民族老年人的ED利用率产生有利影响。尽管医疗保险在老年人口中几乎覆盖了所有人,但也有必要对有关保险范围的种族和族裔差异进行进一步调查。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号