...
首页> 外文期刊>Thrombosis Journal >Clinical benefit of graduated compression stockings for prevention of venous thromboembolism after total knee arthroplasty: post hoc analysis of a phase 3 clinical study of edoxaban
【24h】

Clinical benefit of graduated compression stockings for prevention of venous thromboembolism after total knee arthroplasty: post hoc analysis of a phase 3 clinical study of edoxaban

机译:渐进式加压袜预防全膝关节置换术后静脉血栓栓塞的临床益处:依多沙班三期临床研究的事后分析

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background Guidelines from the Japanese Circulation Society recommend prophylaxis with anticoagulation plus intermittent pneumatic compression or graduated compression stockings (GCS) among patients at the highest risk for developing venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, the benefits of concomitant GCS use for patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and receiving anticoagulation remain unknown. In this study, the efficacy of GCS plus anticoagulation compared with anticoagulation alone was evaluated among patients undergoing TKA. Methods This study is a post hoc analysis of a previously reported phase 3 trial involving patients undergoing TKA. In the primary study, which permitted the use of GCS for mechanical prophylaxis, patients were randomized to receive edoxaban 30?mg once daily or enoxaparin 20?mg twice daily for 11 to 14?days following TKA. The primary endpoint was the incidence of VTE, a composite of symptomatic deep vein thrombosis (DVT), symptomatic pulmonary embolism (PE), and asymptomatic DVT. Treatment comparisons were performed using the chi-square test, and the 95?% confidence intervals were calculated. Results Among patients receiving edoxaban, the incidence of VTE was 3.8 and 5.8?% for patients with and without GCS, respectively. For patients receiving enoxaparin, VTE incidence was 8.4 and 20.8?% among those with and without GCS, respectively. Overall, VTE incidence was 6.0 and 13.0?% for anticoagulated patients with and without GCS mechanical prophylaxis, respectively. No deaths or symptomatic PE were reported during this study. Conclusions Although the incidence of VTE was >2-fold lower among patients receiving anticoagulation plus GCS compared with those receiving anticoagulation alone, statistical significance was not achieved. Further studies are required to confirm the findings of this preliminary analysis. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01181102
机译:日本循环协会的背景指南建议在发生静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)风险最高的患者中进行抗凝,间歇性气动加压或渐进加压袜(GCS)预防。然而,同时进行全膝关节置换术(TKA)和接受抗凝治疗的患者使用GCS的益处仍然未知。在这项研究中,在接受TKA的患者中评估了GCS加抗凝药与单独抗凝药相比的疗效。方法本研究是对先前报道的涉及TKA患者的3期试验的事后分析。在允许使用GCS进行机械预防的主要研究中,患者被随机分为TKA后11到14天每天一次接受edoxaban 30?mg每天一次或依诺肝素20?mg每天两次两次。主要终点是VTE的发生率,VTE是有症状的深静脉血栓形成(DVT),有症状的肺栓塞(PE)和无症状的DVT的综合症。使用卡方检验进行治疗比较,并计算出95%的置信区间。结果在接受依多沙班治疗的患者中,有和没有GCS的患者的VTE发生率分别为3.8%和5.8%。对于接受依诺肝素治疗的患者,有或没有GCS的患者的VTE发生率分别为8.4和20.8%。总体而言,有和没有进行GCS机械预防的抗凝患者的VTE发生率分别为6.0和13.0%。在这项研究中没有死亡或有症状的体育报道。结论尽管与单独接受抗凝治疗的患者相比,接受抗凝加GCS的患者的VTE发生率低2倍以上,但仍未达到统计学意义。需要进一步的研究以确认该初步分析的结果。试验注册ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT01181102

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号