首页> 外文期刊>Tobacco Induced Diseases >Understanding tobacco industry pricing strategy: evidence from China's 2015 Tax Reform
【24h】

Understanding tobacco industry pricing strategy: evidence from China's 2015 Tax Reform

机译:了解烟草业的定价策略:中国2015年税制改革的证据

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Tax increases are the most effective means of reducing tobacco use, but their effectiveness also depends on tobacco industry pricing strategies - which determine the extent to which taxes are passed-onto consumers. Common strategies include the over-shifting or absorption (under-shifting) of taxes. China raised cigarette taxes in 2015, providing a unique opportunity to examine the pricing strategy of China's State Tobacco Monopoly Administration (STMA). Methods: WHO TaXSiM China model was used to calculate the magnitude of the tax pass-through for each cigarette Class at the wholesaler, retailer, and consumer levels after China 2015 tobacco tax increase. The net effect across STMA's entire market was assessed using sales-weighted averages. Results: China's tax increase was partly absorbed in the profit margins of wholesalers across all classes. However, on a weighted average basis, it was fully passed-on at the wholesale level. The tax increase was over-shifted at the retail level, with retail margins increasing except for Class III. The impact on consumers varied by Class, but with the net effect being an over-shifting of tax. Tax was over-shifted for Class V (the cheapest category) and under-shifted for Class III (the most popular and mid-price category). Conclusions: The STMA employed a pricing strategy that was tailored to different Classes with the aim of managing the shape of the market in the manner consistent with its wider "key brand" strategy to promote mid and premium-priced brands.
机译:背景:提高税收是减少烟草使用的最有效手段,但其有效性还取决于烟草业的定价策略,后者决定了税收转嫁给消费者的程度。常见的策略包括过度转移或吸收(转移)税收。中国在2015年提高了卷烟税,为审查中国国家烟草专卖局(STMA)的定价策略提供了独特的机会。方法:使用世卫组织TaXSiM中国模型计算出中国2015年烟草税增加后,在批发商,零售商和消费者层面上每种卷烟的税收通过量。使用销售加权平均数评估了STMA整个市场的净效应。结果:中国的税收增长被所有类别的批发商的利润部分吸收。但是,按照加权平均数,它在批发一级已完全转嫁。零售方面,税收增长过度转移,除第三类外,零售利润率均有所提高。对消费者的影响因类别而异,但最终的结果是税收的过度转移。第五类(最便宜的类别)的税款调高了,第三类(最受欢迎和中价类别)的税款调低了。结论:STMA采用了针对不同类别的定价策略,旨在以与其广泛的“关键品牌”策略相一致的方式管理市场形态,以推广中高端品牌。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号