...
首页> 外文期刊>Tobacco Induced Diseases >The United Nations and its agencies, and their relationship with tobacco industry - an analysis of positions, policy and practice
【24h】

The United Nations and its agencies, and their relationship with tobacco industry - an analysis of positions, policy and practice

机译:联合国及其机构及其与烟草业的关系-立场,政策和做法分析

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background and challenges to implementation: Since the early 1990s, UN agencies have been encouraged to generate resources from the private sector. Owing to a lack of exclusion criteria and standards for partnership and participation, companies largely responsible for causing the NCD epidemic have ironically become development partners with UN agencies. The tobacco industry has historically offered substantial financial assistance to public health initiatives, being cognizant of the significant political mileage these partnerships. In June 2012, at the Rio +25, the UNDP conferred its highest prize to a tobacco company for environment protection. This set-off a strong backlash from tobacco control advocates after which the UNDP Administrator admitted to the oversight. Tobacco control advocates have since urged all UN agencies to exclude tobacco industry. Intervention or response: This survey analyzes the position taken, policies proposed and practices undertaken by United Nations and its agencies since Rio +25, with respect to the tobacco sector (farming, investment, manufacturing and marketing). Results and lessons learnt: While most United Nations agencies have a stated policy to exclude tobacco industry, there are instances when local offices and partners of United Nations or those working through their grants continue to engage and partner with tobacco sector. Two agencies (FAO, ILO) have no stated position on tobacco and continue to engage with tobacco sector. Conclusions and key recommendations: The respectability gained by that tobacco companies by associating with the UN system fundamentally distracts the focus that the global public health community needs to maintain on the growing epidemic of NCDs. Through the influence that the multilateral system exerts on national governments, tobacco companies effectively influence health policy at a global level while obfuscating the focus of their responsibility for aspects of the NCD epidemic and achieving the SDGs. Civil society needs to sustain its efforts to advocate for tobacco exclusion and alert of potential conflicts of interest.
机译:实施的背景和挑战:自1990年代初以来,一直鼓励联合国机构从私营部门筹集资源。由于缺乏关于伙伴关系和参与的排除标准和标准,主要造成非传染性疾病流行的公司已经讽刺地成为联合国机构的发展伙伴。烟草业从历史上就为公共卫生计划提供了大量财政援助,这是由于认识到这些伙伴关系在政治上的重要意义。 2012年6月,联合国开发计划署在里约+25峰会上授予烟草公司环境保护最高奖。这引起了烟草控制倡导者的强烈反对,之后开发计划署署长承认了监督。此后,控烟倡导者敦促所有联合国机构排除烟草业。干预或回应:本次调查分析了自里约+25以来联合国及其机构在烟草部门(农业,投资,制造和销售)采取的立场,提议的政策和采取的做法。取得的成果和经验教训:尽管大多数联合国机构都有明令禁止烟草业的政策,但在某些情况下,联合国地方办事处和合作伙伴或通过赠款开展工作的地方办事处和伙伴继续参与并与烟草部门成为伙伴。两个机构(粮农组织,国际劳工组织)在烟草方面没有明确立场,并继续与烟草部门接触。结论和主要建议:烟草公司通过与联合国系统建立联系而获得的尊重从根本上分散了全球公共卫生界需要关注的非传染性疾病日益流行的关注。通过多边系统对国家政府的影响,烟草公司在全球范围内有效地影响了卫生政策,同时模糊了他们对非传染性疾病流行方面的责任重点并实现了可持续发展目标。民间社会需要继续努力倡导排斥烟草,并提醒潜在的利益冲突。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号