...
首页> 外文期刊>Tobacco Induced Diseases >Smoke-free legislation and socioeconomic inequalities in smoking-related morbidity and mortality among adults: a systematic review
【24h】

Smoke-free legislation and socioeconomic inequalities in smoking-related morbidity and mortality among adults: a systematic review

机译:成人吸烟相关发病率和死亡率中的无烟立法和社会经济不平等:系统回顾

获取原文

摘要

Background: Previous systematic reviews examining the impact of smoke-free legislation (SFL) suggest more beneficial impacts in higher socioeconomic status (SES) groups. However, these have focused on associated changes in smoking behaviour due to a paucity of studies examining health outcomes. This review includes more recent evidence to assess the impact of comprehensive and partial SFL on socioeconomic inequalities in smoking-related: a) disease-specific morbidity and mortality and b) all-cause mortality among adults. Methods: We searched Medline and fourteen other databases up to September 2016. Studies in English, reporting the differential impacts by SES of SFL on smoking-related morbidity and mortality among adults (≥18 years) were eligible. Following data extraction, quality and risk of bias among the included studies were assessed using the Cochrane EPOC and EPHPP criteria. Harvest plot and narrative methods were used to illustrate either i)neutral effect of SFL on inequalities, ii) positive effect (greater benefits among lower SES groups, iii) negative effect (greater benefits among higher SES groups) or iv) mixed/unclear effect. Results: Eight studies (six interrupted time-series and two before-after studies), all from high-income countries were included; five studies examined the impact of comprehensive SFL and three the impact of partial SFL. Implementation of comprehensive SFL led to either a positive effect (three studies) or no effect (two studies) on socioeconomic inequalities in health outcomes; partial SFL led to either no effect (two studies) or unclear effect (one study). The choice of the socioeconomic indicator may have had an important influence on findings. Except for the before-after studies, most studies were judged to be high quality with a suitable study design. Conclusions: Comprehensive SFL potentially reduces inequalities in smoking-related health outcomes, partial SFL may not. All countries should implement comprehensive SFL to achieve the Sustainable Development Goal targets to reduce premature NCD mortality and inequalities.
机译:背景:先前对无烟法规(SFL)的影响进行的系统审查显示,对较高的社会经济地位(SES)群体有更有益的影响。然而,由于缺乏检查健康结果的研究,这些研究集中在吸烟行为的相关变化上。该评价包括较新的证据,以评估全面和部分SFL对与吸烟有关的社会经济不平等的影响:a)特定疾病的发病率和死亡率,以及b)成人全因死亡率。方法:我们搜索了截至2016年9月的Medline和其他14个数据库。以英语进行的研究报道了SFL的SES对成年人(≥18岁)与吸烟相关的发病率和死亡率的不同影响。提取数据后,使用Cochrane EPOC和EPHPP标准评估纳入研究的质量和偏倚风险。收获图和叙述方法被用来说明以下两个方面:i)SFL对不平等的中性作用; ii)正面影响(较低SES组的更大收益; iii)负面影响(较高SES组的更大收益)或iv)混合/不清楚的影响。结果:包括来自高收入国家的八项研究(六项中断的时间序列研究和两项前后研究);五项研究考察了综合性SFL的影响,三项研究了部分SFL的影响。实施综合性SFL会对健康结果中的社会经济不平等产生积极影响(三项研究)或无影响(两项研究);部分SFL导致无效(两项研究)或不清楚的影响(一项研究)。社会经济指标的选择可能会对调查结果产生重要影响。除了前后研究外,大多数研究都被认为是具有适当研究设计的高质量。结论:全面的SFL可能会减少与吸烟相关的健康结局中的不平等,部分SFL可能不会。所有国家都应实施全面的SFL,以实现可持续发展目标,以减少NCD的过早死亡和不平等。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号