首页> 外文期刊>Thrombosis >Is the Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index Being Routinely Used in Clinical Practice?
【24h】

Is the Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index Being Routinely Used in Clinical Practice?

机译:临床实践中是否经常使用肺栓塞严重度指数?

获取原文
       

摘要

Background. The Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (PESI) score can risk-stratify patients with PE but its widespread use is uncertain. With the PESI, we compared length of hospital stay between low, moderate, and high risk PE patients and determined the number of low risk PE patients who were discharged early.Methods. PE patients admitted to St. Joseph Mercy Oakland Hospital from January 2005 to August 2010 were screened. PESI score stratified acute PE patients into low (<85), moderate (86–105), and high (>105) risk categories and their length of hospital stay was compared. Patients with low risk PE discharged early (≤3 days) were calculated.Results. Among 315 PE patients, 51.7% were at low risk. No significant difference in hospital stay between low (7.11 ± 3 d) and moderate (6.88 ± 2.9 d) risk,p> 0.05, as well as low and high risk (7.28 ± 3.0 d),p> 0.05, was found. 9% of low risk patients were discharged ≤ 3 days.Conclusions. There was no significant difference in length of hospital stay between low and high risk groups and only a small number of low risk patients were discharged from the hospital early suggesting that risk tools like PESI may not have a widespread use.
机译:背景。肺栓塞严重程度指数(PESI)评分可以对PE患者进行风险分层,但其广泛使用尚不确定。使用PESI,我们比较了低,中,高风险PE患者的住院时间,并确定了早出的低风险PE患者的数量。筛选了2005年1月至2010年8月入住圣约瑟夫·奥克兰奥克兰医院的PE患者。 PESI评分将急性PE患者分为低(<85),中(86-105)和高(> 105)风险类别,并比较了他们的住院时间。计算出早(≤3天)出院的低风险PE患者。在315例PE患者中,低风险者占51.7%。低(7.11±3 d)和中(6.88±2.9 d)风险之间的住院时间无显着差异,p> 0.05,低和高风险(7.28±3.0 d),p> 0.05。 9%的低危患者出院≤3天。低危和高危人群之间的住院时间没有显着差异,只有少数低危患者较早出院,这表明像PESI这样的危险工具可能没有得到广泛使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号