首页> 外文期刊>Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management >Prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial of electrophysiologically guided femoral nerve block in total knee arthroplasty
【24h】

Prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial of electrophysiologically guided femoral nerve block in total knee arthroplasty

机译:电生理引导股神经阻滞全膝关节置换术的前瞻性,双盲,随机对照试验

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background: The purpose of this study was to compare electrophysiologically guided and traditional nerve stimulator analgesia femoral nerve block after total knee arthroplasty. Methods: Patients scheduled for unilateral total knee arthroplasty were randomized to electrophysiologically guided or traditional nerve stimulator analgesia by pre-emptive single injection femoral nerve block with corresponding assistance. We assessed pain scores using a visual analog scale (VAS, 0 = no pain, 100 = the worst pain) and the volumes of morphine consumed at 4, 24, 48, and 72 hours after total knee arthroplasty. Results: Of the 60 patients enrolled, eight withdrew from the study. The remaining 52 patients were randomized to the electrophysiologically guided group (n = 27) or traditional nerve stimulator analgesia (n = 25) group. Four hours after total knee arthroplasty, VAS scores were significantly lower in the electrophysiologically guided group than in the traditional nerve stimulator group at rest (4.8 ± 1.4 versus 5.9 ± 0.8, P < 0.01) and while moving (6.2 ± 1.1 versus 6.9 ± 0.9, P < 0.01). The total volumes of morphine injected at 24, 48, and 72 hours were significantly decreased in the electrophysiologically guided group ( P < 0.05 each). Variable × time interaction of VAS was significant in the electrophysiologically guided group ( P < 0.05), with each VAS score at 24, 48, and 72 hours being significantly lower than the baseline score ( P < 0.05). VAS scores at every time point were significantly lower in the electrophysiologically group guided than in the traditional nerve stimulator group ( P < 0.05). Conclusion: Electrophysiologically guided single injection femoral nerve block may provide better postoperative analgesia and a greater reduction in the demand for pain killers than femoral nerve block using traditional nerve stimulator analgesia.
机译:背景:本研究的目的是比较全膝关节置换术后电生理引导和传统神经刺激器对股神经阻滞的镇静作用。方法:将计划进行单侧全膝关节置换术的患者通过先发性单次注射股神经阻滞在相应的协助下随机分为电生理指导或传统神经刺激镇痛药。我们使用视觉模拟量表(VAS,0 =无疼痛,100 =最严重疼痛)以及在全膝关节置换术后4、24、48和72小时消耗的吗啡量评估疼痛评分。结果:在60名患者中,有8名退出了研究。其余52例患者随机分为电生理指导组(n = 27)或传统神经刺激镇痛(n = 25)组。全膝关节置换术后四个小时,电生理引导组的VAS评分显着低于传统神经刺激器组的静止(4.8±1.4对5.9±0.8,P <0.01)和运动时(6.2±1.1对6.9±0.9) ,P <0.01)。在电生理引导下,在24、48和72小时注射的吗啡总体积显着降低(每个P <0.05)。在电生理指导组中,VAS的×时间交互作用具有显着性(P <0.05),在24、48和72小时时,每个VAS得分均明显低于基线得分(P <0.05)。在电生理学指导下,每个时间点的VAS评分均明显低于传统神经刺激器组(P <0.05)。结论:与传统的神经刺激镇痛相比,电生理引导的单次注射股神经阻滞可提供更好的术后镇痛效果,并更大程度地减少止痛药的需求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号