首页> 外文期刊>Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management >The Efficacy And Safety Of Aspirin As The Primary Prevention Of Cardiovascular Disease: An Updated Meta-Analysis
【24h】

The Efficacy And Safety Of Aspirin As The Primary Prevention Of Cardiovascular Disease: An Updated Meta-Analysis

机译:阿司匹林作为心血管疾病一级预防的功效和安全性:最新的荟萃分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Purpose: Information regarding the use of aspirin for patients with no known cardiovascular disease remains conflicting. We performed an updated meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of aspirin for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Patients and methods: PubMed, MEDLINE, and Cochrane library databases were searched for randomized controlled trials comparing aspirin with placebos or no treatment published up until November 1, 2018. The primary efficacy endpoint was all-cause death. The secondary endpoints included cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and stroke. The safety endpoints included major bleeding, gastrointestinal bleeding, and hemorrhagic stroke. Results: Fourteen studies were included. Aspirin use was associated with a lower risk of myocardial infarction than placebo use or no treatment (risk ratio [RR], 0.83, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.73–0.95, P = 0.005). Additionally, compared with the control groups, aspirin use was not associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality or cardiovascular mortality. In terms of safety, aspirin use was associated with a higher risk of major bleeding (RR, 1.40, 95% CI: 1.25–1.57, P = 0.000), gastrointestinal bleeding (RR, 1.58, 95% CI: 1.25–1.99, P = 0.000), and hemorrhagic stroke (RR, 1.30, 95% CI: 1.06–1.60, P = 0.011). Furthermore, the treatment effect was not significantly modified by patients’ clinical characteristics. No publication bias was present. Conclusion: Aspirin use reduced the myocardial infarction risk in patients without known cardiovascular disease, but had no effect in terms of reducing the risk of all-cause death, cardiovascular death, and stroke, and increased the risk of major bleeding, gastrointestinal bleeding, and hemorrhagic stroke.
机译:目的:有关阿司匹林用于未知心血管疾病患者的信息仍存在争议。我们进行了更新的荟萃分析,以评估阿司匹林在心血管疾病一级预防中的功效和安全性。患者和方法:在PubMed,MEDLINE和Cochrane库数据库中进行搜索以比较阿司匹林与安慰剂或直到2018年11月1日为止未进行任何治疗的随机对照试验。主要疗效终点是全因死亡。次要终点包括心血管死亡,心肌梗塞和中风。安全终点包括大出血,胃肠道出血和出血性中风。结果:包括十四项研究。与使用安慰剂或不进行治疗相比,使用阿司匹林与发生心肌梗塞的风险较低(风险比[RR],0.83,95%置信区间[CI]:0.73-0.95,P = 0.005)。此外,与对照组相比,使用阿司匹林与全因死亡率或心血管疾病死亡率的降低风险无关。就安全性而言,使用阿司匹林与发生大出血(RR,1.40,95%CI:1.25–1.57,P = 0.000),胃肠道出血(RR,1.58,95%CI:1.25–1.99,P)的风险较高= 0.000)和出血性中风(RR,1.30,95%CI:1.06-1.60,P = 0.011)。此外,患者的临床特征并未明显改变治疗效果。没有发表偏见。结论:阿司匹林的使用降低了无已知心血管疾病患者的心肌梗死风险,但在降低全因死亡,心血管死亡和中风的风险方面没有任何作用,并且增加了大出血,胃肠道出血和出血性中风。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号