首页> 外文期刊>Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management >Bloodstream infections in patients with hematological malignancies: which is more fatal – cancer or resistant pathogens?
【24h】

Bloodstream infections in patients with hematological malignancies: which is more fatal – cancer or resistant pathogens?

机译:血液系统恶性肿瘤患者的血液感染:哪一种致命性更高-癌症或耐药病原体?

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: The primary objective of this study was to report the incidence of bloodstream infections (BSIs) and clinically or microbiologically proven bacterial or fungal BSIs during neutropenic episodes in patients with hematological malignancies. Methods: In this retrospective observational study, all patients in the hematology department older than 14 years who developed febrile neutropenia during chemotherapy for hematological cancers were evaluated. Patients were included if they had experienced at least one neutropenic episode between November 2010 and November 2012 due to chemotherapy in the hematology ward. Results: During 282 febrile episodes in 126 patients, 66 (23%) episodes of bacteremia and 24 (8%) episodes of fungemia were recorded in 48 (38%) and 18 (14%) patients, respectively. Gram-negative bacteria caused 74% (n=49) of all bacteremic episodes. Carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (n=6) caused 12% and 9% of Gram-negative bacteremia episodes and all bacteremia episodes, respectively. Carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria included Acinetobacter baumannii (n=4), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n=1), and Serratia marcescens (n=1). Culture-proven invasive fungal infection occurred in 24 episodes in 18 cases during the study period, with 15 episodes in ten cases occurring in the first study year and nine episodes in eight cases in the second study year. In 13 of 18 cases (72%) with bloodstream yeast infections, previous azole exposure was recorded. Candida parapsilosis , C. glabrata , and C. albicans isolates were resistant to voriconazole and fluconazole. Conclusion: BSIs that occur during febrile neutropenic episodes in hematology patients due to Gram-negative bacteria should be treated initially with non-carbapenem-based antipseudomonal therapy taking into consideration antimicrobial stewardship. Non-azole antifungal drugs, including caspofungin and liposomal amphotericin B, should be preferred as empirical antifungal therapy in the events of possible or probable invasive fungal infections with an absence of pulmonary findings due to increase azole resistance.
机译:背景:这项研究的主要目的是报告血液系统恶性肿瘤患者中性粒细胞减少期间血液感染(BSI)的发生率以及临床或微生物学证明的细菌或真菌的发生率。方法:在这项回顾性观察性研究中,对血液学部门化疗期间发生发热性中性粒细胞减少的所有14岁以上血液科患者进行了评估。如果患者因血液病房中的化疗在2010年11月至2012年11月之间经历了至少1次中性粒细胞减少事件,则将其包括在内。结果:在126例患者的282例高热发作中,分别在48例(38%)和18例(14%)患者中记录了66(23%)菌血症发作和24(8%)真菌病发作。革兰氏阴性细菌占所有细菌发作的74%(n = 49)。耐碳青霉烯的革兰氏阴性菌(n = 6)分别导致12%和9%的革兰氏阴性菌血症发作和所有菌血症发作。耐碳青霉烯的革兰氏阴性细菌包括鲍曼不动杆菌(n = 4),铜绿假单胞菌(n = 1)和粘质沙雷氏菌(n = 1)。在研究期间,经文化证实的侵袭性真菌感染发生在18例中,有24例发生,在第一研究年度中有10例中有15例发生,在第二研究年度中有8例中有9例发生。在18例血液酵母菌感染病例中,有13例(占72%)记录了先前的唑接触。念珠菌,光滑念珠菌和白色念珠菌分离株对伏立康唑和氟康唑耐药。结论:血液病患者因革兰氏阴性细菌而在发热性中性粒细胞减少期间发生的BSI,应首先考虑使用抗微生物药物,以非卡巴培南为基础的抗假单胞菌疗法进行治疗。如果可能的或可能的侵袭性真菌感染(由于吡咯耐药性增加而导致肺部症状消失),则应首选非唑类抗真菌药,包括卡泊芬净和脂质体两性霉素B作为经验性抗真菌治疗。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号