...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of the American Board of Family Practice >Physician Recommendation and Patient Adherence for Colorectal Cancer Screening
【24h】

Physician Recommendation and Patient Adherence for Colorectal Cancer Screening

机译:推荐医师和患者对大肠癌筛查的依从性

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

id="sec-1" class="subsection"> id="p-1">Background: Physician recommendation is one of the strongest, most consistent predictors of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. Little is known regarding characteristics associated with patient adherence to physician recommendations in community and academic based primary care settings. id="sec-2" class="subsection"> id="p-2">Methods: Data were analyzed from 975 patients, aged ≥50 years, recruited from 25 primary care practices in New Jersey. Chi-square and generalized estimate equation analyses determined independent correlates of receipt of and adherence to physician recommendation for CRC. id="sec-3" class="subsection"> id="p-3">Results: Patients reported high screening rates for CRC (59%). More than three fourths of patients reported either screening or having received a screening recommendation (82%). Men (P = .0425), nonsmokers (P = .0029), and patients who were highly educated (P = .0311) were more likely to receive a CRC screening recommendation. Patients more adhere to CRC screening recommendations were older adults (P .0001), nonsmokers (P = .0005), those who were more highly educated (P = .0365), Hispanics (P = .0325), and those who were married (P .0001). id="sec-4" class="subsection"> id="p-4">Conclusions: Community and academic primary care clinicians appropriately recommended screening to high-risk patients with familial risk factors. However, they less frequently recommended screening to others (ie, women and smokers) also likely to benefit. To further increase CRC screening, clinicians must systematically recommend screening to all patients who may benefit.
机译:id =“ sec-1” class =“ subsection”> id =“ p-1”> 背景:医师推荐是结直肠癌(CRC)最强,最一致的预测因子之一)筛选。关于患者在社区和基于学术的初级保健环境中遵守医师推荐的相关特征知之甚少。 id =“ sec-2” class =“ subsection”> id =“ p-2”> 方法:分析了975名年龄较大的患者的数据≥50岁,是从新泽西州的25个初级保健实践中招募的。卡方和广义估计方程分析确定了CRC的接收和遵从医生推荐的独立相关性。 id =“ sec-3” class =“ subsection”> id =“ p-3”> 结果:患者报告的CRC筛查率很高( 59%)。超过四分之三的患者报告接受了筛查或接受了筛查建议(82%)。男性( P = .0425),不吸烟者( P = .0029)和受过高等教育的患者( P = .0311)是更有可能收到CRC筛查建议。坚持CRC筛查建议的患者是老年人( P <.0001),不吸烟者( P = .0005),受过高等教育的人( P = .0365),西班牙裔( P = .0325)和已婚者( P <.0001)。 id =“ sec-4” class =“ subsection”> id =“ p-4”> 结论:适当推荐社区和学术初级保健临床医生对有家族危险因素的高危患者进行筛查。但是,他们很少建议对也可能受益的其他人(即妇女和吸烟者)进行筛查。为了进一步增加CRC筛查,临床医生必须系统地建议所有可能受益的患者进行筛查。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号