首页> 外文期刊>Thoracic cancer. >Comparative effectiveness of concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus EGFR‐tyrosine kinase inhibitors for the treatment of clinical stage IIIb lung adenocarcinoma patients with mutant EGFR
【24h】

Comparative effectiveness of concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus EGFR‐tyrosine kinase inhibitors for the treatment of clinical stage IIIb lung adenocarcinoma patients with mutant EGFR

机译:同步放化疗与EGFR酪氨酸激酶抑制剂治疗突变型EGFR临床IIIb期肺腺癌患者的疗效比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Background The standard of care for fit locally advanced non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients is concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). However, in a subset of patients with lung adenocarcinoma with mutant EGFR (LA‐m EGFR ), the role of EGFR‐tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) is not clear. We compared CCRT versus TKIs for the treatment of stage IIIb LA‐m EGFR in a Taiwanese population. Methods We identified patients from the Taiwan Cancer Registry with good performance status at clinical stage IIIb LA‐m EGFR , diagnosed from June 2011 to December 2015 and treated with either TKIs or CCRT. Clinical covariables and survival status were also collected. The Cox regression method was used in the primary analyses and several propensity score methods and alternative study cohort definitions were used in additional analyses. Results We compared the data of 177 TKI and 22 CCRT patients and found no statistically significant difference in overall (adjusted hazard ratio of death 0.71, 95% confidence interval 0.34–1.47) or lung cancer‐specific survival (hazard ratio 0.65, 95% confidence interval 0.31–1.35). The results of most additional analyses were insignificant. Conclusion In this population‐based study from Taiwan with limited case numbers, no statistical difference in the survival outcomes of patients with clinical stage IIIb LA‐m EGFR treated with either EGFR‐TKIs or CCRT was determined. Further prospective studies are needed to clarify our findings.
机译:背景技术适合于局部晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的护理标准是同步放化疗(CCRT)。但是,在一部分患有突变型EGFR(LA-m EGFR)的肺腺癌患者中,EGFR-酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKIs)的作用尚不清楚。我们比较了CCRT和TKI在台湾人群中治疗IIIb期LA-m EGFR的疗效。方法我们从台湾癌症登记处确定了2011年6月至2015年12月诊断为IIIb LA-m EGFR临床阶段表现良好的患者,并接受TKI或CCRT治疗。还收集了临床协变量和生存状态。在主要分析中使用Cox回归方法,在其他分析中使用几种倾向评分方法和替代研究队列定义。结果我们比较了177例TKI和22例CCRT患者的数据,发现总体(调整后的死亡危险比0.71,95%置信区间0.34–1.47)或肺癌特异性生存率(危险比0.65,95%置信度)无统计学差异。区间0.31–1.35)。大多数其他分析的结果均不重要。结论在来自台湾的病例数有限的这项基于人群的研究中,未确定使用EGFR-TKI或CCRT治疗的临床IIIb LA-m EGFR患者的生存结局无统计学差异。需要进一步的前瞻性研究来阐明我们的发现。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号