首页> 外文期刊>The Permanente Journal >Quality Measurement and Improvement in General Surgery
【24h】

Quality Measurement and Improvement in General Surgery

机译:普通外科的质量测量和改进

获取原文
           

摘要

Increasing emphasis is being placed on health care quality measurement and improvement in the US. Within general surgery, several sophisticated quality-measurement and outcomes systems have been developed. These include the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, the use of selective referral and centers of excellence, the Surgical Care Improvement Project, and the World Health Organization Surgical Safety Checklist. This article reviews each of these quality-improvement initiatives, highlights their relative contributions, and discusses future directions of quality improvement within general surgery. Measuring and improving the quality of health care is an increasingly important goal in American medicine. Patients and their families request information on outcomes, payers require health care systems to address variations in quality of care, and credentialing agencies demand evidence that hospitals meet performance standards. Within general surgery, the American Board of Surgery has implemented new standards for maintenance of certification, requiring surgeons to monitor their own performance.1 The Joint Commission also tracks key indicators of surgical safety and monitors surgeon-specific performance as part of its credentialing process.2 Payers in both the public and private sectors are rapidly implementing centers of excellence and pay-for-performance programs, further driving the need to systematically track and improve the quality of surgical care.3 The importance of measuring and improving surgical quality is well established, but it is unclear how best to accomplish these objectives. Time-consuming review of medical records, the tardiness of retrospective quality measures, and the accuracy and fairness of public report cards are frequently cited shortcomings of current methods.4 However, surgeons and national surgical organizations, such as the American College of Surgeons (ACS), are developing more precise and timely methods of measuring surgical quality, with the goal of ultimately improving outcomes. This article discusses current initiatives in quality measurement and improvement within general surgery and highlights future directions within the field of surgical outcomes.
机译:在美国,医疗质量的衡量和改善越来越受到重视。在普通外科手术中,已经开发了几种复杂的质量测量和结果系统。这些措施包括国家外科手术质量改进计划,选择性转诊和英才中心的使用,外科手术改进项目以及世界卫生组织外科手术安全检查表。本文回顾了这些质量改进措施中的每一项,重点介绍了它们的相对贡献,并讨论了普通外科手术中质量改进的未来方向。在美国医学中,衡量和改善医疗保健质量已成为越来越重要的目标。患者及其家人要求获得有关结果的信息,付款人需要卫生保健系统来解决护理质量的变化,而认证机构则要求提供证明医院符合绩效标准的证据。在普通外科手术中,美国手术委员会已实施了维持认证的新标准,要求外科医生对其自身的表现进行监测。1联合委员会还跟踪手术安全性的关键指标,并在其认证过程中监视特定于外科医生的表现。 2公共部门和私营部门的付款人都在迅速实施英才中心和按绩效付费计划,这进一步推动了对系统地跟踪和改善外科护理质量的需求。3众所周知,衡量和提高外科质量的重要性,但尚不清楚如何最好地实现这些目标。经常引用当前方法的缺点,包括耗时的病历检查,追溯质量措施的时效性以及公开报告卡的准确性和公平性。4但是,外科医生和国家外科组织,例如美国外科医生学会(ACS) )正在开发更精确,及时的方法来衡量手术质量,以期最终改善结果。本文讨论了常规手术中质量测量和改善方面的当前举措,并强调了手术结果领域的未来方向。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号