首页> 外文期刊>The Professional Medical Journal >COMPARISON OF EFFICACY OF FUNCTIONAL ENDOSCOPIC SINUS SURGERY (FESS) AND CONVENTIONAL INTRANASAL POLYPECTOMY IN SINONASAL POLYPOSIS: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL.
【24h】

COMPARISON OF EFFICACY OF FUNCTIONAL ENDOSCOPIC SINUS SURGERY (FESS) AND CONVENTIONAL INTRANASAL POLYPECTOMY IN SINONASAL POLYPOSIS: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL.

机译:鼻窦息肉的功能性内镜鼻窦手术(FESS)和常规鼻内窥镜检查的有效性比较:随机对照试验。

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction: Nasal polyposis (NP) is a chronic inflammatory disease involving mucous membrane in paranasal sinuses and nose. It presents as gelatinous, semitranslucent, smooth, pedunculated pear or round shaped masses comprising of inflamed mucosa that out-pouches into nose. The available surgical options are Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery (FESS) and Conventional Intranasal Polypectomy (CIP). The study aims to compare FESS and CIP in sinonasal polyposis patient in term of symptomatic improvement. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial. Setting: Department of head n’ neck surgery and Otorhinolaryngology, Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences, Islamabad. Period: 01-01-2015 to 20-08-2015. Methodology: A total of 84 patients presenting with nasal polyposis were enrolled. Out of these 84 patients, 42 patients were randomly selected for FESS (Group-A). Rest of the 42 patients were selected for CIP (Group-B). All the information recorded on the Performa was entered and analysed using SPSS version 17. The entire study duration was 31 weeks. Regarding ethical consideration, the study was approved from ethics committee of hospital. Informed consent was obtained from the study participants. Moreover, confidentiality and anonymity of subjects was assured. The patients were followed-up for 2 months duration. The entire study duration was about 8 months. Results: On the basis of scoring of nasal obstruction, in FESS Group-A, 32 (76.19%) patients had completely patent nose after two months and only 10 (23.81%) patients had partially blocked nose. On the other hand in CIP Group-B, only 16 (38.10%) patients had completely patent nose while 26 (60.90%) patients had partially blocked nose after two months. The comparison of sense of smell between both groups also showed that the outcome of Group-A was significantly (p-value = 0.000) better as compared to Group-B. The complete sense of smell was found present in 37 (88.10%) patients in group A in contrast with 19 (45.23%) patients in group B. Conclusion: FESS seems to be a better treatment option for sinonasal polyposis than conventional intranasal polypectomy. However study with larger population size and longer follow up duration is recommended to rationalize the results.
机译:简介:鼻息肉(NP)是一种慢性炎性疾病,涉及鼻旁窦和鼻子的粘膜。它呈凝胶状,半透明,光滑,有蒂的梨状或圆形块状,由发炎的粘膜组成,伸出鼻孔。可用的手术选择包括功能性内窥镜鼻窦手术(FESS)和常规鼻内息肉切除术(CIP)。该研究旨在从症状改善的角度比较鼻窦息肉病患者的FESS和CIP。研究设计:随机对照试验。地点:伊斯兰堡巴基斯坦医学科学研究所颈脖子外科和耳鼻咽喉科。期间:2015年1月1日至2015年8月20日。方法:共有84例鼻息肉病患者入组。在这84名患者中,有42名患者被随机选择接受FESS治疗(A组)。其余42例患者被选择进行CIP(B组)。使用SPSS 17版输入并记录了Performa上记录的所有信息。整个研究时间为31周。关于伦理方面的考虑,该研究获得了医院伦理委员会的批准。从研究参与者处获得知情同意。此外,确保了受试者的机密性和匿名性。随访2个月。整个研究时间约为8个月。结果:根据鼻塞得分,在FESS A组中,两个月后有32例(76.19%)的患者完全patent鼻,只有10例(23.81%)的患者有部分鼻塞。另一方面,在CIP B组中,两个月后仅16例(38.10%)的患者完全鼻涕,而26例(60.90%)的患者部分阻塞了鼻子。两组之间嗅觉的比较还表明,与B组相比,A组的结果明显更好(p值= 0.000)。与B组的19名患者(45.23%)相比,A组的37名患者(88.10%)存在完全的嗅觉。结论:与常规的鼻内息肉切除术相比,FESS似乎是鼻窦息肉更好的治疗选择。但是,建议对人群较大且随访时间较长的研究进行合理化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号