...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of the South African Veterinary Association >Clinical and serological response of wild dogs (Lycaon pictus) to vaccination against canine distemper, canine parvovirus infection and rabies
【24h】

Clinical and serological response of wild dogs (Lycaon pictus) to vaccination against canine distemper, canine parvovirus infection and rabies

机译:野狗(Lycaon pictus)对犬瘟热,犬细小病毒感染和狂犬病疫苗接种的临床和血清学反应

获取原文
           

摘要

Wild dogs Lycaon pictus (n = 8) were vaccinated 4 times against canine distemper (n = 8) (initially with inactivated and subsequently with live attenuated strains of canine distemper) and canine parvovirus infection (n = 8) over a period of 360 days. Four of the wild dogs were also vaccinated 3 times against rabies using a live oral vaccine and 4 with an inactivated parenteral vaccine. Commercially-available canine distemper, canine parvovirus and parenteral rabies vaccines, intended for use in domestic dogs, were used. None of the vaccinated dogs showed any untoward clinical signs. The inactivated canine distemper vaccine did not result in seroconversion whereas the attenuated live vaccine resulted in seroconversion in all wild dogs. Presumably protective concentrations of antibodies to canine distemper virus were present in all wild dogs for at least 451 days. Canine parvovirus haemagglutination inhibition titres were present in all wild dogs prior to the administration of vaccine and protective concentrations persisted for at least 451 days. Vaccination against parvovirus infection resulted in a temporary increase in canine parvovirus haemagglutination inhibition titres in most dogs. Administration of both inactivated parenteral and live oral rabies vaccine initially resulted in seroconversion in 7 of 8 dogs. These titres, however, dropped to very low concentrations within 100 days. Booster administrations resulted in increased antibody concentrations in all dogs. It was concluded that the vaccines were safe to use in healthy subadult wild dogs and that a vaccination protocol in free-ranging wild dogs should at least incorporate booster vaccinations against rabies 3-6 months after the first inoculation.
机译:在360天内,对野狗Lycaon pictus(n = 8)进行了4次针对犬瘟热(n = 8)的疫苗接种(最初是灭活的,然后是活的减毒犬瘟毒减毒株)和犬细小病毒感染(n = 8)。 。还使用活的口服疫苗对野犬中的四只接种了3次狂犬病疫苗,对灭活的肠胃外疫苗进行了四次野犬疫苗接种。使用了旨在用于家犬的市售犬瘟热,犬细小病毒和肠胃外狂犬病疫苗。接种的狗均未显示出任何不良的临床体征。灭活的犬瘟热疫苗未导致血清转化,而减毒活疫苗在所有野狗中均导致血清转化。在所有野狗中存在至少451天的犬瘟热病毒抗体的保护浓度。在施用疫苗之前,所有细小犬都存在犬细小病毒血凝抑制滴度,并且保护性浓度持续至少451天。细小病毒感染的疫苗接种导致大多数狗的细小病毒血凝抑制滴度暂时升高。灭活肠胃外和口服狂犬病疫苗的接种最初导致8只狗中的7只发生血清转化。但是,这些滴度在100天内下降到非常低的浓度。加强给药导致所有狗的抗体浓度增加。结论是,该疫苗可安全用于健康的亚成年野狗,并且在自由接种的野狗中接种疫苗的方案应至少在首次接种后3-6个月内加入针对狂犬病的加强疫苗接种。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号