首页> 外文期刊>The Internet Journal of Tropical Medicine >Formol-petrol stool concentration method (Wirkom-Tata's stool concentration method): A Cheap Novel Technique For Detecting Intestinal Parasites In Resource-Limited Countries
【24h】

Formol-petrol stool concentration method (Wirkom-Tata's stool concentration method): A Cheap Novel Technique For Detecting Intestinal Parasites In Resource-Limited Countries

机译:甲醛汽油粪便浓缩方法(Wirkom-Tata的粪便浓缩方法):资源有限国家中一种便宜的检测肠道寄生虫的新技术

获取原文
       

摘要

In search of a new method for stool concentration and to establish the incidence of intestinal parasites infection amongst primary school pupils in Djottin, Cameroon, 477 stool samples were examined in the Medical Laboratory of ST. Elizabeth's Catholic Mission Shisong. Formol-ether concentration technique detected 35.76% of the total number of parasites seen. Formol- petrol concentration method was 34.50% effective, direct smear method was 27.20% effective while the saturated sodium chloride (flotation) method detected only 2.27% of the parasites. The high incidence of intestinal parasite infection in these children was found to be linked to poor hygiene and low level of education of the pupils. The Formol- petrol stool concentration technique which gave a parasite recovery rate of 34.50% which indicates that, it is a new and cheap and very effective method for examination of human stool samples. Introduction Intestinal parasitic infections remain a health problem especially in the developing countries of the world [6]. It should be noted that most of these infections are as a result of low standard of living, poverty, poor sanitation and lack efficient diagnostic facilities.According to World Health Organisation [11] human intestinal parasites cause significant morbidity and mortality through out the world, particularly in under developed countries and especially in children. Infection by soil- transmitted helminths (intestinal worms) has been increasingly unrecognized as an important public health problem. In the 1993 World Development Report, intestinal parasite ranked first as the main cause of disease burden in children aged 5-14 years and also ranked highly as the disease that can be efficiently controlled by cost- effective intervention.In order to diagnose intestinal parasites, many methods can be considered. The choice of a particular technique will depend on its affordability, ease to carry out, its effectiveness and level of professionalism involved. Examples of these methods are DNA probes, PCR and direct fluorescent antibody methods [8], which are highly sensitive but are too costly to be used in the developing countries. It has been proved that direct stool smear, formol-ether and salt flotation techniques in stool microscopy offers many advantages over other diagnostic methods of detecting intestinal parasites. If performed correctly, these methods are sensitive, simple and economical [8].Direct stool smear [4], formol-ether concentration [1] and flotation methods are used in diagnosing intestinal parasites by hospital and researchers in developing countries because of their affordability, simplicity and sensitivity.For the fact that the density of the parasite in the faeces is low, direct smear method is useful for the observation of motile protozoan trophozites and examination of exudates, but is not recommended solely for the routine examination of suspected parasitic infections [2]. Therefore there is need for increase probability of finding the parasite in the faecal samples to allow for accurate diagnosis, hence there is need to concentrate. Though direct stool smear technique is quick to prepare and inexpensive when compared with modified formol-ether concentration methods, it can miss parasites (ova, cysts and larvae) if concentration is too low or if too much debris or fat is present. Sand, seeds or other faecal debris can make fixing cover slips onto slide difficulty. Most diagnostic centers show high performance to this method, owing to the fact that it is inexpensive and non-time –consuming thereby disregarding the consequences of misdiagnosis, which has led to prevalence of parasitic diseases and morbid conditions. Such complications resulting from misdiagnosis have been described [3].Formol-ether concerntration techniques described by Allen and Ridley employs the use of ether or ethyl acetate as a lipid solvent and 10% formol saline as a fixative.This method recovers must ova,cysts and larvae and m
机译:为了寻找一种新的粪便浓缩方法,并确定喀麦隆德约特丁小学生的肠道寄生虫感染发生率,在ST医学实验室检查了477份粪便样本。伊丽莎白的天主教宣教士。甲醚-醚浓缩技术检测到所见寄生虫总数的35.76%。甲醛浓缩法的有效率为34.50%,直接涂片法的有效率为27.20%,而饱和氯化钠(浮选)法仅检测到2.27%的寄生虫。这些儿童的肠道寄生虫感染高发被发现与卫生状况差和学生教育程度低有关。富马酚粪便浓缩技术可实现34.50%的寄生虫回收率,这表明,它是一种新型,廉价且非常有效的检测人粪便样品的方法。引言肠道寄生虫感染仍然是一个健康问题,特别是在世界上发展中国家[6]。应当指出的是,这些感染大多数是由于生活水平低下,贫穷,卫生条件差和缺乏有效的诊断设施所致。根据世界卫生组织[11]的研究,人类肠道寄生虫病在全世界范围内引起大量的发病和死亡,特别是在发达国家,尤其是在儿童中。由土壤传播的蠕虫(肠道蠕虫)引起的感染已日益被认为是重要的公共卫生问题。在1993年的《世界发展报告》中,肠道寄生虫是5-14岁儿童疾病负担的主要原因,也是可以通过具有成本效益的干预措施有效控制的疾病。在诊断肠道寄生虫方面,可以考虑很多方法。特定技术的选择将取决于其可承受性,易于实施,其有效性和所涉及的专业水平。这些方法的例子是DNA探针,PCR和直接荧光抗体方法[8],它们具有很高的灵敏度,但在发展中国家使用起来过于昂贵。业已证明,粪便显微镜检查中的直接粪便涂片,甲酚-醚和盐浮选技术比检测肠道寄生虫的其他诊断方法具有许多优势。如果正确执行,这些方法将灵敏,简单且经济[8]。发展中国家的医院和研究人员使用直接粪便涂片[4],甲酚浓度[1]和浮选法来诊断肠道寄生虫。由于粪便中的寄生虫密度低,因此直接涂片法可用于观察活动性原生动物营养体和渗出液,但不建议仅用于常规检查可疑的寄生虫感染[2]。因此,需要增加在粪便样品中发现寄生虫的可能性以允许准确诊断,因此需要集中精力。尽管直接粪便涂片技术与改良的甲醚浓缩方法相比,制备迅速且价格便宜,但是如果浓度太低或碎片或脂肪过多,它可能会漏掉寄生虫(卵,囊肿和幼虫)。沙子,种子或其他粪便碎片可能会使固定盖滑倒到滑行困难上。大多数诊断中心对这种方法都表现出很高的性能,因为它价格便宜且不费时间,从而无视误诊的后果,从而导致了寄生虫病和病态的盛行。这种由于误诊而引起的并发症已被描述[3]。Allen和Ridley所描述的甲醚-醚相关技术使用乙醚或乙酸乙酯作为脂质溶剂,并使用10%甲酚盐水作为固定剂。该方法可回收卵,囊肿。和幼虫和米

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号