首页> 外文期刊>The Annals of Thoracic Surgery: Official Journal of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons and the Southern Thoracic Surgical Association >Port Access Cardiac Operations Can Be Safely Performed With Either Endoaortic Balloon or Chitwood Clamp
【24h】

Port Access Cardiac Operations Can Be Safely Performed With Either Endoaortic Balloon or Chitwood Clamp

机译:可以通过腔内气囊或Chitwood夹钳安全地进行端口进入心脏操作

获取原文
       

摘要

Study DesignOperative ApproachStatistical AnalysisResultsAnalysis of Preoperative Patient VariablesQuantification of Operative VariablesAnalysis of Postoperative Clinical OutcomesCommentLimitationsDiscussionReferencesMinimally invasive, right thoracotomy (port access) approaches to intracardiac operations (mitral valve, tricuspid valve, atrial septal defect, intracardiac tumors) are becoming increasingly accepted by surgeons, cardiologists, and patients alike. Standard techniques for?cardioplegic arrest of the heart have included endoaortic balloons and Chitwood clamps. Concerns have been raised regarding the potential increased risk of vascular adverse events (embolization, dissection, stroke, lower extremity ischemia) associated with endoaortic balloon occlusion. We undertook this study to evaluate the vascular risk associated with endoaortic balloon use.MethodsAll patients undergoing minimally invasive, port access, right thoracotomy operations from 1998 to 2012 at our institution were retrospectively analyzed. Patients undergoing aortic occlusion with the Chitwood clamp (n?= 189) were compared with patients undergoing occlusion with the endoaortic balloon (n?= 875).ResultsThere was no statistical difference in the rate of?dissection between patients undergoing aortic occlusion with an endoaortic balloon (1.03%) and those receiving a Chitwood clamp (1.06%). Similarly, there was no difference in the rate of type A dissection between aortic occlusion strategies (endoaortic balloon?= 0.57%, n?= 5, vs Chitwood clamp?= 1.06%, n?= 2, p?= 0.28). No difference in the incidence of stroke was identified between the endoaortic balloon and the Chitwood clamp (2.2% vs 2.1%, p?= 1.0).ConclusionsMinimally invasive cardiac operations using a peripheral cannulation strategy can be safely performed with minimal vascular adverse events incorporating either endoaortic balloon or Chitwood clamp?aortic occlusion. As experience with the endoaortic balloon is gained, the incidence of vascular adverse events can be reduced to?nearly negligible rates.CTSNet classification:35Dr Hargrove discloses financial relationships with Edwards Lifesciences and Sorin.Intracardiac operations are increasingly performed with minimally invasive approaches. Referring cardiologists and patients alike are seeking centers of excellence capable of performing mitral valve, tricuspid valve, atrial septal defect, and intracardiac tumor surgical procedures with nonsternotomy techniques. Several reports from our center and from others have demonstrated excellent technical outcomes that are equivalent to the gold standard sternotomy approaches [
机译:研究设计手术方法统计分析结果术前患者变量分析手术变量定量分析术后临床结果分析局限性讨论参考文献心脏内手术的微创,右胸切开术(端口进入)方法(二尖瓣,三尖瓣,房间隔缺损,心内膜肿瘤,心内膜肿瘤)正日益被接受和病人一样。心律失常性心脏骤停的标准技术包括主动脉内球囊和Chitwood钳。人们对与主动脉内球囊阻塞相关的血管不良事件(栓塞,解剖,中风,下肢缺血)的潜在风险增加感到担忧。方法回顾性分析本院1998年至2012年接受微创,经口入路,右胸切开手术的所有患者。比较使用Chitwood钳主动脉闭塞的患者(n = 189)和使用主动脉内球囊闭塞的患者(n = 875)。结果主动脉内膜消融与主动脉闭塞的患者的解剖率没有统计学差异。气球(1.03%)和接受Chitwood夹子的人(1.06%)。类似地,在主动脉阻塞策略之间,A型夹层的发生率没有差异(主动脉内气囊= 0.57%,n = 5,而奇伍德钳夹= 1.06%,n = 2,p = 0.28)。在主动脉内气囊和Chitwood钳之间未发现卒中发生率的差异(2.2%vs 2.1%,p?= 1.0)。结论使用外围插管策略进行的微创心脏手术可以安全地进行,同时将血管不良事件降至最低主动脉内气囊或奇伍德钳夹主动脉闭塞。随着主动脉内膜球囊经验的增加,血管不良事件的发生率可以降低到几乎可以忽略的水平。CTSNet分类:35 Hargrove博士披露了与Edwards Lifesciences和Sorin的财务关系。心内手术越来越多地采用微创方法进行。推荐的心脏病专家和患者都在寻求卓越的中心,这些中心能够使用非胸骨切开术进行二尖瓣,三尖瓣,房间隔缺损和心内肿瘤外科手术。我们中心和其他中心的几份报告显示了出色的技术成果,这些成果相当于金标准的胸骨切开术方法[

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号