首页> 外文期刊>The Annals of Thoracic Surgery: Official Journal of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons and the Southern Thoracic Surgical Association >Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis For Esophagectomy: A Survey of Practice Patterns Among Thoracic Surgeons
【24h】

Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis For Esophagectomy: A Survey of Practice Patterns Among Thoracic Surgeons

机译:食管切除术的静脉血栓栓塞预防:胸外科医生的实践模式的调查

获取原文
           

摘要

Current guidelines for gastrointestinal cancer surgical intervention in high-risk patients recommend postoperative venous thromboembolism (VTE) chemical prophylaxis for 4 weeks with low-dose unfractionated heparin or low-molecular-weight heparin, but specific guidelines for esophagectomy are lacking. This survey identified the clinical patterns affecting postesophagectomy VTE chemoprophylaxis use among general thoracic surgeons.MethodsGeneral Thoracic Surgery Club members were invited to complete an online survey on VTE prophylaxis to analyze clinical factors affecting their choices.ResultsSeventy-seven surgeons (37% membership) responded; of these, 94% (72 of 77) completed fellowships, and 76% (58 of 77) worked at universities. VTE chemoprophylaxis administration varied widely in drug, dosing, and duration, with 30% using suboptimal dosing of unfractionated heparin (every 12 hours). Participants agreed that esophagectomy patients are at high VTE risk, yet 29% (22 of 76) of surgeons delay VTE chemoprophylaxis until postoperative day 1. Only 13% (10 of 77) prescribe postdischarge chemoprophylaxis. Minimally invasive surgeons (>90% of cases) were more likely to prescribe postdischarge prophylaxis (p?= 0.007). Epidurals, routinely used by 65% (51 of 78), led to less compliance with recommended dosing. Only 53% (27 of 51) of pain teams allow unfractionated heparin every 8?hours, yet 73% (37 of 51) allow suboptimal dosing (every 12 h). Postoperative major complications were identified as a VTE risk factor by only 21% (15 of 72) of surgeons. Most (92% [68 of 74]) would follow esophagectomy-specific guidelines, if developed.ConclusionsThoracic surgeons agree that VTE chemoprophylaxis is necessary for esophagectomy, yet substantial variability exists in current practice. A noteworthy proportion use suboptimal dosing, and very few choose postdischarge prophylaxis. To improve postesophagectomy morbidity and mortality outcomes, thoracic surgeons are willing to follow evidence-based guidelines for VTE chemoprophylaxis.
机译:当前针对高危患者进行胃肠道癌外科手术治疗的指南建议对小剂量普通肝素或低分子量肝素进行静脉静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)化学预防4周,但尚缺乏针对食管切除术的具体指南。这项调查确定了影响普通胸外科医师食管切除术后VTE化学预防使用的临床模式。方法邀请普通胸外科俱乐部会员完成有关VTE预防的在线调查,以分析影响其选择的临床因素。结果,有77名外科医师(占会员的37%)回答了;其中,94%(77个中的72个)已完成研究金,76%(77个中的58个)已在大学工作。 VTE的化学预防给药在药物,剂量和持续时间方面差异很大,其中使用30%的未分级肝素(每12小时)使用次优剂量。参加者一致认为,食管切除术患者的VTE风险较高,但29%(76名中的22名)医生将VTE化学预防推迟到术后第1天。只有13%(77名中的10名)规定出院后进行化学预防。微创外科医师(> 90%的病例)更有可能规定出院后预防(p = 0.007)。硬膜外麻醉通常占65%(78个中的51个),导致对推荐剂量的依从性降低。疼痛小组中只有53%(51个中的27个)每8小时服用一次普通肝素,而73%(51个中的37个)允许次佳剂量(每12小时)。仅有21%(72/15)的外科医生将术后主要并发症确定为VTE危险因素。多数(92%[74]中的68%)(如果制定)将遵循特定于食管切除术的指南。结论胸外科医师同意食管切除术必须进行VTE化学预防,但目前的操作存在很大差异。值得注意的比例是使用次优剂量,很少选择放电后预防。为了改善食管切除术后的发病率和死亡率,胸外科医师愿意遵循基于证据的VTE化学预防指南。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号