首页> 外文期刊>The Annals of Thoracic Surgery: Official Journal of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons and the Southern Thoracic Surgical Association >Comparison of Thoracoscopic Segmentectomy and Thoracoscopic Lobectomy for Small-Sized Stage IA Lung Cancer
【24h】

Comparison of Thoracoscopic Segmentectomy and Thoracoscopic Lobectomy for Small-Sized Stage IA Lung Cancer

机译:小型IA期肺癌的胸腔镜下切除术和胸腔镜下肺叶切除术的比较

获取原文
       

摘要

PatientsOperative TechniqueStatistical AnalysesResultsThoracoscopic lobectomy for lung cancer has been widely accepted, but thoracoscopic segmentectomy remains controversial because of the complexity of the procedure and of the fear of increased local recurrence. This study compared outcomes between thoracoscopic segmentectomy and thoracoscopic lobectomy in patients with small-sized (≤2 cm) stage IA non-small cell lung cancer.MethodsBetween March 2006 and August 2011, 39 thoracoscopic segmentectomies and 81 thoracoscopic lobectomies were performed in 120 patients with small-sized (≤2 cm) stage IA lung cancer. Clinicopathologic factors, local recurrence rate, and survival rate were compared.ResultsThe two groups were similar in age, sex, pulmonary function, and tumor size. There were no conversions from video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery to open or from segmentectomy to lobectomy. There were no in-hospital deaths. The two groups had a similar incidence of postoperative complications. Local recurrence rates were similar after thoracoscopic segmentectomy (5.1%) and thoracoscopic lobectomy (4.9%). No significant difference was observed in 5-year overall or disease-free survivals after thoracoscopic segmentectomy or thoracoscopic lobectomy. Multivariate Cox regression analyses showed tumor size was the only independent prognostic factor for disease-free survival.ConclusionsThoracoscopic segmentectomy is a safe option and provides comparable oncologic results to thoracoscopic lobectomy for small (≤2 cm) peripheral stage IA non-small cell lung cancer. Tumor size is an independent prognostic factor of disease-free survival for stage IA patients with small-sized lesions.CTSNet classification:10Lobectomy with lymph node dissection is the standard surgical treatment for stage IA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), whereas segmentectomy remains controversial. The landmark study that compared lobectomy vs sublobar resection (segmentectomy and wedge resection) of stage IA NSCLC was reported in 1995 by the Lung Cancer Study Group (LCSG) [
机译:患者手术技术统计分析结果胸腔镜肺叶切除术已被广泛接受,但胸腔镜肺段切除术因手术的复杂性和对局部复发的担心而仍引起争议。方法比较2006年3月至2011年8月,在120例患有IA的小(≤2cm)IA非小细胞肺癌患者中,进行胸腔镜肺段切除术和胸腔镜肺叶切除术的结局。小型(≤2cm)IA期肺癌。比较两组的临床病理因素,局部复发率和生存率。结果两组年龄,性别,肺功能和肿瘤大小相似。从电视辅助胸腔镜手术到开放手术或从节段切除术到肺叶切除术没有任何转换。没有院内死亡。两组术后并发症发生率相似。胸腔镜下切除术(5.1%)和胸腔镜下肺叶切除术(4.9%)后的局部复发率相似。胸腔镜节段切除术或胸腔镜肺叶切除术的5年总生存期或无疾病生存期无显着差异。多因素Cox回归分析显示,肿瘤大小是无病生存的唯一独立预后因素。结论胸腔镜肺段切除术是一种安全的选择,可为腹腔镜小叶切除术(≤2cm)提供类似的肿瘤学结果,用于IA期非小细胞肺癌。肿瘤大小是IA期小病灶患者无病生存的独立预后因素。CTSNet分类:10淋巴结清扫术是IA期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的标准手术治疗,而节段切除术仍然有争议。肺癌研究小组(LCSG)于1995年报道了一项具有里程碑意义的研究,该研究比较了IA期NSCLC的肺叶切除与肺叶下切除(节段切除和楔形切除)[

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号