【24h】

Comparison of Aortic Diameter and Area After Endovascular Treatment of Aortic Dissection

机译:血管内治疗主动脉夹层后主动脉直径和面积的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Patient Population and Morphology DataStatistical AnalysisResultsWhole Aorta MeasurementsFalse Lumen MeasurementsTrue Lumen MeasurementsComparison of Linear, Quadratic, and Exponential ModelsDifferent methods have been used to assess remodeling of the thoracic aorta after endovascular treatment of Stanford type B aortic dissections. Changes in morphology may be described using diameter, area, or volume. The aim of this study was to determine if aortic diameter measurements could be used to approximate aortic area in order to refine reporting standards.MethodsThe study population encompassed 100 patients enrolled in the VIRTUE registry (designed to assess thoracic endografting with the Valiant Stent Graft System [Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN] for the treatment of type B aortic dissections). Diameter and area measurements of the true lumen, false lumen, and whole aorta were made using three-dimensional computed tomographic (3D CT) workstations, at different anatomic locations. Measurements included preoperative, postoperative, and follow-up scans. The Pearson test was used to determine general correlation between diameter and volume at each location. Scatter plots were drawn and linear regression models were used to draw a line of best fit. Comparison of these with nonlinear models was performed.ResultsAortic true and false lumen diameter and area showed good correlation (p < 0.001) in the majority of anatomic locations. This relationship was present preoperatively and during follow-up (p < 0.001). The linear regression models fit well with high R2 values. At very large aortic sizes nonlinear models were a slightly better fit, but this was not significant.ConclusionsAortic diameter measurements correlate with luminal areas in patients with type B aortic dissection. This implies area increases proportionately with diameter over time. Therefore, diameter measurements using multiplanar reconstructions based on a central luminal line appear to be adequate when assessing aortic remodeling after endovascular treatment of aortic dissection.CTSNet classification:26Dr Thompson discloses a financial relationship with Medtronic.Various measurements have been used to describe morphologic changes in the thoracic aorta after endovascular treatment of Stanford type B dissection [
机译:患者人口和形态数据统计分析结果整个主动脉测量错误的流明测量真实的流明测量线性,二次和指数模型的比较在斯坦福B型主动脉夹层的腔内治疗后,已经使用了多种方法来评估胸主动脉的重塑。可以使用直径,面积或体积来描述形态的变化。这项研究的目的是确定是否可以使用主动脉直径测量值来近似主动脉面积以完善报告标准。方法研究人群包括100名参加VIRTUE登记册的患者(旨在通过Valiant支架移植物系统评估胸腔内移植术[ Medtronic,明尼阿波利斯,明尼苏达州]用于治疗B型主动脉夹层)。使用三维计算机断层扫描(3D CT)工作站在不同的解剖位置对真腔,假腔和整个主动脉进行直径和面积测量。测量包括术前,术后和随访扫描。使用Pearson检验确定每个位置的直径和体积之间的一般相关性。绘制散点图,并使用线性回归模型绘制最佳拟合线。结果与大多数模型解剖位置的主动脉真假管腔直径和假管腔面积显示出良好的相关性(p <0.001)。这种关系在术前和随访期间均存在(p <0.001)。线性回归模型非常适合高R2值。在主动脉很大的情况下,非线性模型的拟合度稍好一些,但这并不重要。结论B型主动脉夹层患者的主动脉直径测量值与腔面积相关。这意味着面积随着时间的推移与直径成比例地增加。因此,在评估主动脉夹层血管内治疗后评估主动脉重构时,使用基于中心管腔线的多平面重建术进行直径测量似乎是足够的.CTSNet分类:26 Thompson博士披露了与Medtronic的财务关系,已使用各种测量来描述斯坦福B型夹层血管内治疗后的胸主动脉[

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号