首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Nuclear Medicine >Comparison of 18F-FDG and PiB PET in Cognitive Impairment
【24h】

Comparison of 18F-FDG and PiB PET in Cognitive Impairment

机译:18F-FDG和PiB PET在认知障碍中的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of glucose metabolism and amyloid deposition as demonstrated by 18F-FDG and Pittsburg Compound B (PiB) PET to evaluate subjects with cognitive impairment. Methods: Subjects were selected from existing participants in the Mayo Alzheimer's Disease Research Center or Alzheimer's Disease Patient Registry programs. A total of 20 healthy controls and 17 amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI), 6 nonamnestic mild cognitive impairment (naMCI), and 13 Alzheimer disease (AD) subjects were imaged with both PiB and 18F-FDG PET between March 2006 and August 2007. Global measures for PiB and 18F-FDG PET uptake, normalized to cerebellum for PiB and pons for 18F-FDG, were compared. Partial-volume correction, standardized uptake value (SUV), and cortical ratio methods of image analysis were also evaluated in an attempt to optimize the analysis for each test. Results: Significant discrimination (P 0.05) between controls and AD, naMCI and aMCI, naMCI and AD, and aMCI and AD by PiB PET measurements was observed. The paired groupwise comparisons of the global measures demonstrated that PiB PET versus 18F-FDG PET showed similar significant group separation, with only PiB showing significant separation of naMCI and aMCI subjects. Conclusion: PiB PET and 18F-FDG PET have similar diagnostic accuracy in early cognitive impairment. However, significantly better group discrimination in naMCI and aMCI subjects by PiB, compared with 18F-FDG, was seen and may suggest early amyloid deposition before cerebral metabolic disruption in this group.
机译:这项研究的目的是比较葡萄糖代谢和淀粉样蛋白沉积的诊断准确性,如18F-FDG和匹兹堡化合物B(PiB)PET所证明的,以评估患有认知障碍的受试者。方法:受试者选自梅奥阿尔茨海默氏病研究中心或阿尔茨海默氏病患者注册计划的现有参与者。在2006年3月至2007年8月之间,共用PiB和18F-FDG PET对20名健康对照和17名轻度轻度认知障碍(aMCI),6名非轻度轻度认知障碍(naMCI)和13名阿尔茨海默病(AD)受试者进行了成像。比较了PiB和18F-FDG PET摄取的总体指标,将其标准化为PiB的小脑和18F-FDG的pons。还对部分体积校正,标准摄取值(SUV)和图像分析的皮层比率方法进行了评估,以尝试针对每个测试优化分析。结果:通过PiB PET测量观察到对照组与AD,naMCI和aMCI,naMCI和AD以及aMCI和AD之间存在显着差异(P <0.05)。全球措施的成对分组比较显示,PiB PET与18F-FDG PET表现出相似的显着组分离,只有PiB显示naMCI和aMCI受试者显着分离。结论:PiB PET和18F-FDG PET在早期认知障碍中具有相似的诊断准确性。然而,与18F-FDG相比,在Pi的naMCI和aMCI受试者中,与18F-FDG相比,组分辨明显更好,这可能表明该组脑代谢中断之前淀粉样蛋白沉积较早。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号