首页> 外文期刊>The Annals of Thoracic Surgery: Official Journal of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons and the Southern Thoracic Surgical Association >Bilobectomy Versus Lobectomy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Comparative Study of Outcomes, Long-Term Survival, and Quality of Life
【24h】

Bilobectomy Versus Lobectomy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Comparative Study of Outcomes, Long-Term Survival, and Quality of Life

机译:非小细胞肺癌双叶切除术与肺叶切除术:结果,长期生存率和生活质量的比较研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Preoperative EvaluationQuality of Life AssessmentStatistical AnalysisResultsLong-Term OutcomesPostoperative QOLComparison Between Upper and Middle Lobe Group and Middle and Lower Lobe GroupCommentSupplementary DataReferencesWe aimed to compare long-term survival and quality of life (QOL) outcomes after bilobectomy and lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer patients.MethodsA cohort of 951 consecutive patients was identified from a single treatment institution, of whom 128 underwent bilobectomy and 823, lobectomy. Propensity score matching (1:3) was applied to balance known confounders between the two surgical groups and resulted in 512 patients (matched cohort). Unmatched and matched analyses were performed to compare clinical outcomes between the two groups, including operative mortality rate, morbidity rate, long-term survival, overall QOL, and specific symptoms.ResultsOperative mortality was higher in the bilobectomy group than in the lobectomy group (2.3% versus 0.5%, p?= 0.022). Morbidity rates did not differ significantly between the two groups in either unmatched or matched cohort. In the unmatched analysis, the overall survival (OS [p?= 0.003]) and disease-free survival (DFS [p?= 0.003]) were significantly lower in the bilobectomy group; whereas in the matched analysis, no significant difference was found in either OS (p?= 0.473) or DFS (p?= 0.387). Using multivariate analysis, the operation type was not found to be a significant factor for either OS (hazard ratio 1.18; 95% confidence interval: 0.91 to 1.52; p?= 0.22) or DFS (hazard ratio 1.22; 95% confidence interval: 0.95 to 1.58; p?= 0.13). Patients who underwent bilobectomy appeared to have similar measures of QOL as lobectomy patients, except for coughing and dyspnea.ConclusionsOur findings indicate that patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated with bilobectomy had similar morbidity, OS, DFS, and overall QOL as patients treated with lobectomy, but had higher mortality by matched analysis.The Supplementary FigureSupplementary Figure?and TablesTables can be viewed in the online version of this article [http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.03.018] on http://www.annalsthoracicsurgery.org.Bilobectomy is generally considered a standard radical procedure for patients with lung cancer invading both superior and middle or lower and middle lobes. The first bilobectomy was performed by Churchill in 1932 [
机译:术前评估生活质量评估统计分析结果长期结果术后QOL上,中叶组与中,下叶组之间的比较补充数据参考我们旨在比较非小细胞肺癌患者在双叶切除和肺叶切除术后的长期生存率和生活质量(QOL)结果方法从一个单一的治疗机构中鉴定出连续951例患者,其中128例接受了双叶切除术,823例进行了肺叶切除术。倾向得分匹配(1:3)用于平衡两个手术组之间的已知混杂因素,并导致512名患者(匹配队列)。进行了不匹配和匹配分析以比较两组的临床结局,包括手术死亡率,发病率,长期存活率,总体QOL和特定症状。结果双叶切除组的手术死亡率高于肺叶切除组(2.3 %对0.5%,p 1 = 0.022)。在未配对或配对队列中,两组的发病率没有显着差异。在无与伦比的分析中,双叶切除组的总生存期(OS [p?= 0.003])和无病生存期(DFS [p?= 0.003])明显较低;而在匹配分析中,在OS(p?= 0.473)或DFS(p?= 0.387)中都没有发现显着差异。使用多变量分析,发现操作类型不是OS(危险比1.18; 95%置信区间:0.91至1.52; p?= 0.22)或DFS(危险比1.22; 95%置信区间:0.95)的重要因素。至1.58;p≤0.13)。进行双叶切除术的患者除咳嗽和呼吸困难外,似乎具有与肺叶切除术患者相似的QOL指标。结论我们的研究结果表明,经双叶切除术治疗的非小细胞肺癌患者的发病率,OS,DFS和总体QOL与所治疗的患者相似肺叶切除术,但通过匹配分析具有较高的死亡率。补充图补充图和表格可在本文的在线版本中查看[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.03.018]一般而言,双叶切除术被认为是侵袭上中叶和中下叶和中叶的肺癌患者的标准根治性手术。丘吉尔于1932年进行了第一次双叶切除术[

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号