...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Graduate Medical Education >Assessing Effectiveness of a Geriatrics Rotation for Second-Year Internal Medicine Residents
【24h】

Assessing Effectiveness of a Geriatrics Rotation for Second-Year Internal Medicine Residents

机译:评估第二年内科住院医师老年病轮换的有效性

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

What was known Residents need to understand the medical and biopsychosocial aspects of caring for older adults.;What is new An expanded geriatric medicine experience for second-year internal medicine residents explored inpatient and ambulatory care, and provided a systems-based practice module.;Limitations Single institution study and small sample reduce generalizability; knowledge gains were not sustained in the postimplementation year.;Bottom line A focused geriatrics rotation is feasible, was highly rated by learners, and improved clinical geriatrics knowledge. Assessing geriatrics competencies remains challenging.;Editor's Note: The online version of this article contains a handout describing each activity in the module.;Introduction Geriatrics training is mandatory for internal medicine (IM) residents.1 Despite curricula and guidelines, creating a learning experience that meets residents' needs remains a challenge. Equally difficult is measuring the effectiveness of this rotation; in addition to knowledge, impact on attitude is a high priority.2 Resident-level assessments of geriatrics knowledge are few, limited in scope, and often outdated. The University of Michigan Geriatrics Clinical Decision-Making Assessment Instrument,3 although well-crafted, includes palliative care content and dates back to 2006. Attitudinal scales4–6 may not elicit honest answers.7 A recent academic geriatric and palliative care curriculum was associated with enhanced geriatric knowledge but not enhanced attitudes8; it is unclear whether the true effect of the program was being measured. The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education's promotion of competency in systems-based practice (SBP) dovetails well with geriatrics content, but a hospital-based experience provides residents with little practical exposure. The challenges of incorporating SBP into resident education have been described.9,10 In geriatrics, experiences outside the usual care sites are essential, and this requires planning and cooperation with community partners.11,12 Since 2003, the New York Presbyterian Hospital Weill Cornell Campus (NYPH-WCC) has had an Acute Care of Elders (ACE) Unit13 serving as the site for IM resident learning along with physician assistant students, nursing students, social work interns, and medical students. When the IM geriatrics rotation began a decade ago, extra administrative support enabled interns to make 1 posthospital visit during their 4-week block. Over time, the service became busier and the interns were unable and unwilling to leave, despite growing educational emphasis on transitions and ambulatory care. Changes in duty hour regulations in 2011 necessitated restructuring of resident training. The IM geriatrics rotation was modified to include a dedicated 1-week SBP module whose goals were to facilitate residents' exposure to non–acutely ill elderly patients and the community-based programs that help maintain their physical and emotional health. This article describes the rotation and the initial evaluation of its effectiveness.;Methods Rotation Description A 4-week geriatrics rotation is required for all IM postgraduate year (PGY)–2 residents at NYPH-WCC. Each resident has 3?weeks of inpatient geriatrics (2?weeks of day coverage and 1?week of night coverage providing direct care for 8 to 10 patients with medical illnesses from the community and nursing homes) and 1?week (5?weekdays) in an outpatient SBP module (SBP-OM). The PGY-1 residents do not participate, while PGY-3 residents are assigned to the rotation to ensure adequate coverage, but do not repeat the SBP experience. The inpatient team is led by a faculty geriatrician. The home base is the 19-bed ACE unit, but the unit is not closed and the team is not strictly geographic. The SBP-OM represents a multicomponent intervention with exposures to different sites of care and resources available to older adults. These exposures include observation, direct patient care, team meet
机译:已知居民需要了解照顾老人的医学和生物心理方面的知识。新内容扩大了对二年级内科住院医师的老年医学经验,探索了住院和非卧床护理,并提供了基于系统的实践模块。局限性单机构研究和少量样本降低了推广性;在实施后的一年中,知识的获取并没有持续。底线集中的老年医学轮换是可行的,受到学习者的高度评价,并提高了临床老年医学知识。评估老年医学能力仍然具有挑战性。编者注:本文的在线版本包含描述模块中每个活动的讲义。入门医学对内科(IM)居民是必不可少的。1尽管有课程和指导方针,但仍可以创造学习经验满足居民需求仍然是一个挑战。同样难以衡量这种轮换的有效性;除知识外,对态度的影响也是当务之急。2居民层面对老年医学知识的评估很少,范围有限且经常过时。密歇根大学老年医学临床决策评估工具[3]虽然精心设计,但包含姑息治疗的内容并可以追溯到2006年。态度量表4-6可能无法得出诚实的答案。7最近的学术性老年和姑息治疗课程与增强了老年知识,但态度却没有增强8;尚不清楚该计划的真正效果是否正在得到衡量。研究生医学教育认证委员会在基于系统的实践(SBP)方面的能力提升与老年医学内容吻合良好,但基于医院的经验为居民提供了很少的实际接触机会。已经描述了将SBP纳入居民教育的挑战。9,10在老年病院,常规护理场所之外的经验至关重要,这需要与社区合作伙伴进行计划和合作。11,12自2003年以来,纽约长老会医院威尔·康奈尔校园(NYPH-WCC)设有一个长者急性护理(ACE)单位,作为IM居民学习的场所,还有医师助理学生,护理学生,社会工作实习生和医学生。十年前开始IM老年医学轮换时,额外的行政支持使实习生可以在其4周内进行1次院后访问。随着时间的流逝,尽管教育对过渡和非卧床护理的重视程度有所提高,但服务变得更加繁忙,实习生无法也不愿离开。 2011年的工作时间规定发生变化,因此必须对居民培训进行重组。 IM老年医学轮换经过修改,包括一个专用的为期1周的SBP模块,其目标是促进居民接触非重症老年患者以及基于社区的计划,以帮助他们保持身体和情绪健康。本文介绍了轮换及其有效性的初步评估。方法轮换说明NYPH-WCC的所有IM研究生(PGY)–2居民都需要进行4周的老年医学轮换。每位居民有3周的老人科住院时间(每天2周的住院时间和1周的夜间医疗服务,为社区和疗养院的8至10名患有医疗疾病的患者提供直接护理)和1周的住院时间(5周的工作日)在门诊SBP模块(SBP-OM)中。 PGY-1居民不参加,而PGY-3居民被分配到轮换以确保足够的覆盖范围,但不重复SBP经验。住院团队由一名老年医生领导。基地是拥有19张床的ACE单位,但该单位未封闭且团队也不严格地域。 SBP-OM代表了一种多成分干预措施,暴露于老年人的不同护理场所和可用资源。这些风险包括观察,直接患者护理,团队见面

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号