首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Graduate Medical Education >Using Simulation Education With Deliberate Practice to Teach Leadership and Resource Management Skills to Senior Resident Code Leaders
【24h】

Using Simulation Education With Deliberate Practice to Teach Leadership and Resource Management Skills to Senior Resident Code Leaders

机译:使用经过精心实践的模拟教育向高级驻地代码负责人教授领导力和资源管理技能

获取原文
           

摘要

What was known Simulation-based education with deliberate practice can promote skill acquisition.;What is new Study assesses internal medicine residents' skills after a simulation-based intervention compared to a traditional lecture format to learn team communication and crisis resource management (CRM).;Limitations Single institution, and small sample size limit generalizability.;Bottom line Residents exposed to simulation communicated and completed CRM skills more effectively than those taught in a lecture format.;Introduction Effective communication and coordinated teamwork are critical to the successful management of complex events such as cardiac arrests or “codes.”1–5 Delays in resuscitation can result in poor outcomes.6–8 The essential “call for help” summons the emergency response personnel that the code leader must direct.1 While crisis resource management (CRM) skills have been adapted from industry to medicine to enhance team performance,3,9–15 these skills often are not explicitly taught during medical education.3,9,12,13,16–19 Simulation-based education improves learner knowledge and skills, and allows practice in controlled, safe environments.12,13,20 Deliberate practice, a feedback-based educational method, requires continued practice of challenging skills.21,22 Simulation-based education combined with deliberate practice8–26 promotes skill acquisition27–32 and adherence to Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) algorithms.25,26,32 Senior internal medicine residents at Cooper University Hospital routinely act as code leaders. All receive medical education about codes, but not CRM skills required to manage resuscitation efforts. We hypothesized that using simulation with deliberate practice to teach CRM skills to code leaders would improve performance of targeted measures when compared with a lecture format.;Methods For academic years 2006–2007 through 2008–2009, all senior postgraduate year (PGY)–3 internal medicine residents were invited to participate in the study. Participants within each year were randomly assigned to 2 groups: the lecture (LEC) group attended 2 lectures about team management, and the simulation (SIM) group engaged in simulation-based education with deliberate practice sessions (figure). View larger version (16K) FIGUREStudy Design;Results Preintervention Three groups of PGY-3 residents (19 in 2006, 19 in 2007, and 18 in 2008) were enrolled for a total of 56. Four participants (2 each in 2006 and 2007) were unavailable for the intervention, leaving 52 participants. The participants in each group were similar with respect to training level, age, and experience. All 52 attempted ventilation and 92% (48 of 52) did call for help. Seventy-eight percent (41 of 52) failed to successfully ventilate the patient, and all continued to attempt ventilation without asking for assistance from the arriving anesthesiologists. In all cases of failed ventilation, the simulated patient died (table?2). Debriefing revealed that the participants recognized their inability to manage available resources. Sixty-four percent (27 of 41) of those who could not ventilate the patient were aware of their ineffective ventilation, and none requested help.;Discussion Our study showed that simulation-based education with deliberate practice of CRM skills resulted in improved rare event and team management by senior internal medicine resident code leaders. While lecture format yielded some improvement in team and event management, the improvement was significantly greater for members of the simulation training group, especially for communication results. During debriefing sessions, participants disclosed difficulties they encountered while attempting to manage the event and team. While the LEC group demonstrated improved management, they reported that they did not feel comfortable asking the team for suggestions. In contrast, SIM participants reported that these sessions taught them to ask the team for help, resulting in greater
机译:所谓的基于模拟的有意识的实践教育可以促进技能的获得。新的研究评估了基于模拟的干预后内科住院医师的技能,与传统的讲课形式相比,它可以学习团队沟通和危机资源管理(CRM)。局限性单一机构,并且样本量较小,限制了通用性。底线处于模拟状态的居民比以讲课形式进行教学的人更有效地交流和完成了CRM技能。简介有效的沟通和协调的团队合作对于成功管理复杂事件至关重要1–5复苏延迟可能导致不良结果。6–8基本的“求助”召唤了代码负责人必须指挥的应急人员。1危机资源管理(CRM) )技能已从行业应用到医学,以增强团队绩效,3,9–15这些技能通常不是在医学教育中合法授课。3,9,12,13,16–19基于模拟的教育提高了学习者的知识和技能,并允许在受控,安全的环境中进行练习。12、13、20谨慎实践,一种基于反馈的教育方法,需要继续练习具有挑战性的技能。21,22基于模拟的教育加上刻意的练习8–26促进了技能的培养27–32并遵守高级心脏生命支持(ACLS)算法。25,26,32库珀大学的高级内科住院医师医院通常担任代码主管。所有人都接受过有关代码的医学教育,但没有接受管理复苏工作所需的CRM技能。我们假设,与讲课形式相比,使用模拟和刻意的实践向CRM领导者讲授CRM技能将改善目标措施的性能。方法2006-2007学年至2008-2009学年,所有高等研究生年(PGY)-3内科住院医师应邀参加了这项研究。每年的参与者被随机分为2组:讲座(LEC)组参加了有关团队管理的2场讲座,模拟组(SIM)参加了基于模拟的教育,并进行了有针对性的练习(图)。查看大图(16K)图形研究设计;结果预先干预登记了三组PGY-3居民(2006年为19名,2007年为19名,2008年为18名),共有56名参与者。四名参与者(2006和2007年各有2名)无法进行干预,剩下52名参与者。每组的参与者在培训水平,年龄和经验方面都相似。 52位尝试通气的人中有92%(52位中的48位)确实寻求帮助。 78%(52个患者中的41%)未能使患者成功通气,并且所有人都继续尝试通气,而未寻求到达的麻醉师的帮助。在所有通气失败的情况下,模拟患者均死亡(表2)。汇报显示,参与者认识到他们无力管理可用资源。不能通气的患者中有百分之六十四(41人中有27位)知道自己的通气不佳,没有人要求帮助。;讨论我们的研究表明,基于模拟的教育和刻意的CRM技能练习可以改善罕见事件的发生以及由高级内科住院医师规范负责人进行的团队管理。尽管讲座形式在团队和事件管理方面取得了一些进步,但对于模拟培训小组的成员,尤其是在交流结果方面,进步明显更大。在情况汇报会上,参与者透露了他们在尝试管理活动和团队时遇到的困难。尽管LEC小组表现出改善的管理水平,但他们报告说,他们不愿意向团队征求建议。相反,SIM参与者报告说,这些课程教会他们向团队寻求帮助,从而获得了更大的收益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号