...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Graduate Medical Education >Resident and Preceptor Perceptions of Preceptor Integration Into Resident Clinic Scheduling Templates
【24h】

Resident and Preceptor Perceptions of Preceptor Integration Into Resident Clinic Scheduling Templates

机译:受体整合到住院日程安排模板中的居民和受体感知

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background?Some internal medicine residency programs on X+Y schedules have modified clinic preceptor schedules to mimic those of the resident cohort (resident matched). This is in contrast to a traditional model, in which preceptors supervise on the same half-day each week.Objective?We assessed preceptor and resident perceptions of the 2 precepting models.Methods?We surveyed 44 preceptors and 97 residents at 3 clinic sites in 2 academic medical centers. Two clinics used the resident-matched model, and 1 used a traditional model. Surveys were completed at 6 months and 1 year. We assessed resident and preceptor perceptions in 5 domains: relationships between residents and preceptors; preceptor familiarity with complex patients; preceptor ability to assess milestone achievements; ability to follow up on results; and quality of care.Results?There was no difference in perceptions of interpersonal relationships or satisfaction with patient care. Preceptors in the resident-matched schedule reported they were more familiar with complex patients at both 6 months and 1 year, and felt more comfortable evaluating residents' milestone achievements at 6 months, but not at 1 year. At 1 year, residents in the resident-matched model perceived preceptors were more familiar with complex patients than residents in the traditional model. The ability to discuss patient results between clinic weeks was low in both models.Conclusions?The resident-matched model increased resident and preceptor perceptions of familiarity with complex patients and early preceptor perceptions of comfort in assessment of milestone achievements.
机译:背景:一些按X + Y时间表进行的内科住院医师培训计划已修改了临床接受者时间表,以模仿住院患者队列(住院患者匹配的患者)的时间表。这与传统模式相反,在传统模式中,导师每周在同一个半天进行监督。目的?我们评估了两种导师模式对导师和住户的感知。 2个学术医学中心。有两家诊所使用了居民匹配模型,而有一家则使用了传统模型。调查在6个月零1年完成。我们在5个领域中评估了居民和感知者的感知:居民与感知者之间的关系;以及居民与感知者之间的关系。熟悉复杂患者的感受;接受者评估里程碑成就的能力;跟进结果的能力;结果:人际关系或患者对护理的满意度没有差异。居民匹配时间表中的感受器报告说,他们在6个月和1年时对复杂的患者更加熟悉,并且在评估6个月而不是1个月时居民的里程碑成就时感到更加自在。在1年时,与传统模型中的居民相比,与居民匹配的模型中的居民对感知器的了解程度更高。在两个模型中,讨论临床结果之间的能力都很低。结论:住院医师匹配模型增加了住院医师和受体对复杂患者的熟悉度,以及早期医师对里程碑成就评估的舒适度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号