...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Graduate Medical Education >Why Residents Consider Working Beyond the Duty Hour Limits: Implications of the ACGME 2011 Duty Hour Standards
【24h】

Why Residents Consider Working Beyond the Duty Hour Limits: Implications of the ACGME 2011 Duty Hour Standards

机译:居民为何考虑超出工作时间限制:ACGME 2011工作时间标准的含义

获取原文
           

摘要

BackgroundThe Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education 2011 duty hour standards became effective on 7 1, 2011. One of the new standards allows residents to exceed the limit on continuous duty hours in unusual circumstances relating to patient or family need or rare educational opportunities. There are no data about how often or in what circumstances residents would consider exceeding their duty hour limits using this new provision in the standards. We surveyed internal medicine residents to explore these questions.MethodsWe conducted an anonymous cross-sectional survey of internal medicine residents at a midwestern tertiary-care hospital to determine how often they had considered exceeding duty hour limits in the preceding 2?weeks. We analyzed responses using descriptive statistics and χ~(2) tests for comparisons.ResultsWe obtained responses from 51 of 86 residents (59%). Of those residents, 69% (35/51) indicated that they had wanted to exceed duty hour limits at least once in the prior 2?weeks. The most common reason cited was to provide continuity of care for a patient. The 24?+?6–hour rule was the standard most likely to be broken (cited by 66%; 23/35).ConclusionsProgram leadership should anticipate that residents will commonly identify situations in which they will consider exceeding duty hour limits. It will be important to provide guidance to residents early in the year about the situations that would be appropriate for the application of this new standard.
机译:背景技术2011年研究生医学教育认证委员会的工作时间标准于2011年7月1日生效。其中一项新标准允许居民在与患者或家庭需求或难得的教育机会有关的特殊情况下超过连续工作时间的限制。没有数据表明居民使用标准中的这一新规定会多久或在什么情况下考虑超过其工作时间限制。我们调查了内科住院医师以探讨这些问题。方法我们在中西部三级医院对内科住院医师进行了匿名横断面调查,以确定他们在前两周内考虑超过工作时间限制的频率。我们使用描述性统计数据和χ〜(2)检验对响应进行分析以进行比较。结果我们从86位居民中的51位获得了响应(59%)。在这些居民中,有69%(35/51)表示他们希望在过去2周内至少超过一次工作时间限制。引用的最常见原因是为患者提供连续护理。 24?+?6小时规则是最有可能被违反的标准(引用率为66%; 23/35)。结论计划领导者应预期居民通常会确定他们会考虑超出工作时间限制的情况。在今年年初向居民提供有关适用此新标准的情况的指导很重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号