首页> 外文期刊>The Internet Journal of Anesthesiology >Rapid Sequence Induction Practices In The United States And The United Kingdom: A Comparative Survey Study.
【24h】

Rapid Sequence Induction Practices In The United States And The United Kingdom: A Comparative Survey Study.

机译:美国和英国的快速序列归纳实践:比较调查研究。

获取原文
           

摘要

Purpose:We aimed to survey the members of anesthesia departments in two large university hospitals, University of Washington (Seattle, USA) (UW-US) and University of Nottingham (Nottingham, UK) (UN-UK) to compare differences in their current approach to rapid sequence induction (RSI). Methods: The survey was distributed in electronic and paper format in 2009. Overall response rate was 48.6% (146/300). Participants were asked to indicate their practice for a RSI technique for emergency appendectomy in a previously healthy adult. Data were summarized descriptively using frequency distribution. Chi square statistic was used to compare frequency of responses.Results: There were several differences in the practice of RSI: 1. Aspiration prophylaxis was preferred in UW-US (40%) versus UN-UK (12%); 2. Preferred patient position was with a head support in UW-US versus 30o head of the bed elevation in UN-UK; 3. UW-US reported not to use mask ventilation prior to intubation (55%) versus UN-UK (78%); 4. The preferred opioid was fentanyl (93%) for UW-US and alfentanil (74%) for UN-UK; 5. Adjuvant drugs were used by 68% of UW-US versus 8% of UN-UK providers; 6. Commonly used induction agents were propofol in UW-US (94%) and thiopental in UN-UK (51%). Both centers preferred succinylcholine for muscle relaxation to rocuronium (UW-US 80% versus UN-UK 90%). Conclusions: RSI practice differed significantly across continents. Due to disagreement and a lack of scientific evidence regarding the standards of RSI, it appears that traditional RSI practice has already been abolished. Revised evidence based guidance statement is due and has the potential to reduce practice variability. Introduction Pulmonary aspiration is defined as the inhalation of oropharyngeal or gastric contents into the lower respiratory tract. Curtis Mendelson, an obstetrician, was the first physician to study the pathogenesis of the disease (Mendelson’s Syndrome) using both case reports and animal experiments. Following contamination, lung epithelial cells and alveolar macrophages secrete chemical mediators, attracting and activating neutrophils, which in turn release proteases and reactive oxygen species, damaging the alveolar - capillary unit. Pneumonia, chemical pneumonitis and respiratory distress syndrome are possible adverse outcomes associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The overall incidence of pulmonary aspiration of gastric contents during procedures undertaken with general anesthesia is estimated to be 1 in 2,000–3,000 cases. Aspiration is more frequent in emergency (1 in 600–900) than elective (1 in 3,000–4,000) procedures [1].Rapid sequence induction (RSI) is commonly used to secure the airway in patients considered to be at risk of regurgitation and pulmonary aspiration of gastric contents. Stept and Safar originally published the 15-step RSI technique in 1970. The key elements of this technique should include the reduction of gastric volume, the control of acidity and passive movement of gastric content, the minimization of time during which the airway is unprotected, and avoiding hypoxemia during attempts to secure the airways with tracheal intubation. All of these steps would appear to be logical and justifiable precautions. However, there has been debate over the understanding, the evidence base and clinical value of the individual components of this approach [1]. The apparent absence of compelling evidence poses challenges to both the modern practitioner and those responsible for training junior colleagues. It would seem reasonable to adopt and teach what is deemed to be “best practice” at regional, national or international level. Unfortunately a number of published surveys indicate significant variations in practice among anesthesia providers [2]. The purpose of this study was to describe the most utilized strategies to manage RSI and compare practice among university-affiliated hospital providers trained and practicing in different countries.
机译:目的:我们旨在调查华盛顿大学(美国西雅图)(UW-US)和诺丁汉大学(英国诺丁汉)(UN-UK)两家大型大学医院麻醉科的成员,以比较他们目前的差异快速序列诱导(RSI)的方法。方法:2009年以电子和纸质形式分发了该调查。总体答复率为48.6%(146/300)。要求参与者指出他们在以前健康的成年人中进行急诊阑尾切除术的RSI技术的实践。使用频率分布描述性地汇总数据。结果:RSI的实践存在一些差异:1. UW-US(40%)相对于UN-UK(12%)首选吸气预防; 2.首选患者位置是在UW-US中使用头枕,而在UK-UK中床头抬高30o。 3.威斯康星大学(美国)报告说,在插管前不使用面罩通气(55%),而联合国-英国(78%); 4.对于阿联酋-美国,首选阿片类药物为芬太尼(93%),对于联合王国,首选阿片类药物为阿芬太尼(74%); 5.威斯康星大学的美国有68%的人使用了辅助药物,而英国联合王国的医务人员则是8%。 6.常用的诱导剂是UW-US中的异丙酚(94%)和UN-UK中的硫喷妥钠(51%)。两个中心都希望使用琥珀酰胆碱来放松罗库溴铵(UW-US为80%,UN-UK为90%)。结论:RSI的实践在各大洲之间差异很大。由于对RSI的标准存在分歧和缺乏科学依据,因此似乎已经废除了传统的RSI惯例。经修订的基于证据的指导声明应有,并有可能减少实践差异。引言肺部抽吸是指将口咽或胃内容物吸入下呼吸道。产科医生柯蒂斯·门德尔森(Curtis Mendelson)是第一位使用病例报告和动物实验研究该病发病机制(门德尔森综合症)的医生。污染后,肺上皮细胞和肺泡巨噬细胞分泌化学介质,吸引并激活中性粒细胞,继而释放出蛋白酶和活性氧,从而破坏了肺泡-毛细血管单元。肺炎,化学性肺炎和呼吸窘迫综合征可能是与明显的发病率和死亡率相关的不良结果。在全身麻醉的过程中,胃内容物经肺部抽吸的总发生率估计为2,000–3,000例中的1例。急诊(600–900分之一)比择期(3,000–4,000分之一)中的抽吸更为频繁[1]。快速序列诱导(RSI)通常用于确保被认为有返流和高危风险的患者的气道安全。胃内容物的肺部抽吸。 Stept和Safar最初于1970年发布了15步RSI技术。该技术的关键要素应包括减少胃体积,控制酸度和胃内容物的被动运动,最小化气道不受保护的时间,并在尝试通过气管插管固定气道时避免低氧血症。所有这些步骤似乎是合乎逻辑且合理的预防措施。然而,关于这种方法的各个组成部分的理解,证据基础和临床价值一直存在争论[1]。显然缺乏令人信服的证据给现代从业者和负责培训下级同事的人都带来了挑战。在区域,国家或国际一级采用和教授被认为是“最佳实践”的做法似乎是合理的。不幸的是,许多已发表的调查表明麻醉提供者之间的实践存在很大差异[2]。这项研究的目的是描述最有效的策略来管理RSI,并比较在不同国家接受培训和执业的大学附属医院提供者之间的实践。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号