...
首页> 外文期刊>The Internet Journal of Anesthesiology >The need for Intra-operative cell salvage training to reduce the use of Allogeneic ‘bank’ Blood during Surgery. Is the routine adoption of a competency-based assessment in Intra-operative cell salvage required?
【24h】

The need for Intra-operative cell salvage training to reduce the use of Allogeneic ‘bank’ Blood during Surgery. Is the routine adoption of a competency-based assessment in Intra-operative cell salvage required?

机译:需要进行术中细胞挽救训练,以减少手术期间异体“库”血的使用。是否需要常规采用基于能力的评估进行术中细胞抢救?

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

We performed a survey of all specialist registrars and their equivalents in the Imperial (North West Thames) region to assess their experience of and training in Intra-operative red cell salvage (ICS) and asked whether they would be confident to use ICS unsupervised for emergency out of hours work. 85% of respondents said that they would not be confident to set up or use ICS unsupervised.Allogeneic blood transfusion is expensive, associated with uncommon but potentially severe adverse consequences and of limited availability. Intra-operative red cell salvage (ICS) is a well-tried, cost effective method of reducing the use of allogeneic blood. Many organisations including the UK Blood Transfusion and Tissue Transplantation Service (www.transfusionguidelines.org) and the Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland have advocated the use of ICS for all suitable cases [1]. An operating department assistant (ODA) or anaesthetic nurse, with the appropriate experience, may set up the equipment but it will have to be supervised and used by an anaesthetist or, in a cardiac theatre, a Perfusionist. Anaesthetists with appropriate training and experience are therefore necessary if use of ICS is to be maximised. Allogeneic blood transfusion is expensive, associated with uncommon but potentially severe adverse consequences and of limited availability. Intra-operative red cell salvage (ICS) is a well-tried, cost effective method of reducing the use of allogeneic blood. Many organisations including the UK Blood Transfusion and Tissue Transplantation Service (www.transfusionguidelines.org) and the Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland have advocated the use of ICS for all suitable cases [1]. An operating department assistant (ODA) or anaesthetic nurse, with the appropriate experience, may set up the equipment but it will have to be supervised and used by an anaesthetist or, in a cardiac theatre, a Perfusionist. Anaesthetists with appropriate training and experience are therefore necessary if use of ICS is to be maximised. Methods A questionnaire (see Appendix) was sent by email to all Specialist Registrars in the Imperial School of Anaesthesia (North West Thames) region. A range of questions were asked to gauge the training and experience Registrars had received with ICS. Questions were asked regarding the familiarity with any guidelines on ICS use, the number and type of cases in which ICS had been used in the past 6 months (surgical speciality and whether elective or emergency cases) and whether or not they had received training (either formal or informal) on using a cell salvage device. We also asked the trainees if they would be confident at setting up and operating a cell salvage device themselves. Results Questionnaires were sent by email to 150 Specialist Registrars (SPR 1-5 / ST 3-7) and Clinical Fellows in the Imperial region and 108 (72%) were completed and returned. ICS devices are available in all the main District General and Teaching Hospitals in the region. 53 Registrars (49%) surveyed were in years 3-5 of Specialist Registrar training (ST 5-7) and 8 were clinical fellows [see fig. 1]. 63.2% of those surveyed were not familiar with any guidelines on ICS use [see fig.2]. 75.2% of Registrars had been involved in cases using ICS only 3 times or less in the past 6 months with 35% not having used ICS at all during this period [fig. 3]. Just under 41% of Registrars had never received any training, formal or informal, on the use and set up of a cell saver device. Only 6.5% reported having received formal training [see fig.4]. Most commonly Anaesthetists delivered ICS training but ODA and Perfusionists also made a significant contribution [fig.5.]. The use of ICS was most commonly experienced in Vascular, Cardiothoracic and Obstetric surgery [fig.6]. 85% of Registrars had never set up a cell saver device themselves and were not confident at doing so and operating it. Discussion Due to risks of infection
机译:我们对帝国(西北泰晤士河)地区的所有专业注册商及其等效人员进行了调查,以评估他们在术中抢救红细胞(ICS)方面的经验和培训,并询问他们是否有信心在无监督的情况下使用ICS进行应急非工作时间。 85%的受访者表示,他们对在无人监督的情况下建立或使用ICS充满信心。同种异体输血价格昂贵,伴有罕见但潜在的严重不良后果,且供应有限。术中挽救红细胞(ICS)是一种经过实践检验且具有成本效益的方法,可以减少异体血液的使用。许多组织,包括英国输血和组织移植服务(www.transfusionguidelines.org)和大不列颠及爱尔兰麻醉师协会,都提倡在所有合适的病例中使用ICS [1]。具有适当经验的手术室助理(ODA)或麻醉护士可以安装设备,但必须由麻醉师或在心脏剧院中由灌注师监督和使用。因此,如果要最大程度地利用ICS,必须要有经过适当培训和经验的麻醉师。同种异体输血是昂贵的,伴有罕见但潜在的严重不良后果,并且供应有限。术中挽救红细胞(ICS)是一种经过实践检验且具有成本效益的方法,可以减少异体血液的使用。许多组织,包括英国输血和组织移植服务(www.transfusionguidelines.org)和大不列颠及爱尔兰麻醉师协会,都提倡在所有合适的病例中使用ICS [1]。具有适当经验的手术室助理(ODA)或麻醉护士可以安装设备,但必须由麻醉师或在心脏剧院中的灌注师监督和使用。因此,如果要最大程度地利用ICS,必须要有经过适当培训和经验的麻醉师。方法通过电子邮件将问卷调查表(请参阅附录)发送给麻醉学帝国理工学院(西北泰晤士河地区)的所有专科医师。提出了一系列问题,以评估注册服务商在ICS方面接受的培训和经验。询问以下问题:对ICS使用指南的熟悉程度,在过去6个月中使用ICS的病例数和类型(外科专科以及选择性或急诊病例)以及是否接受过培训(正式或非正式)使用抢救装置。我们还询问了受训人员,他们是否有信心自己设置和操作电池抢救装置。结果问卷通过电子邮件发送给150个专业注册服务商(SPR 1-5 / ST 3-7),帝国地区的临床研究员和108人(72%)已完成并返回。该地区所有主要的地区综合医院和教学医院都可以使用ICS设备。接受调查的53名注册服务商(49%)在3-5年的专业注册服务商培训中(ST 5-7),其中8位是临床研究人员[见图。 1]。 63.2%的受访者对ICS使用指南不熟悉[见图2]。在过去6个月中,有75.2%的注册服务商只使用过ICS不到3次,而在此期间,有35%的人根本没有使用过ICS [图。 3]。不到41%的注册服务机构从未接受过有关使用和设置Cell Saver设备的正式或非正式培训。据报告只有6.5%的人接受过正式培训[见图4]。最常见的是麻醉师进行了ICS培训,但ODA和灌注专家也做出了重要贡献[图5]。 ICS的使用最常见于血管,心胸和产科手术[图6]。 85%的注册商从未亲自安装过节电设备,也没有信心进行操作。讨论由于感染的风险

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号