首页> 外文期刊>The Internet Journal of Healthcare Administration >Measuring Client Satisfaction in Residential Aged Care Settings: A Narrative Review of Instruments
【24h】

Measuring Client Satisfaction in Residential Aged Care Settings: A Narrative Review of Instruments

机译:在住院老年护理机构中衡量客户满意度:对工具的叙述性回顾

获取原文
       

摘要

Background: The aim of this paper is to provide a narrative review of validated instruments measuring client satisfaction in residential aged care facilities, including key attributes of the identified instruments. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted using scientific journal databases (Medline, ProQuest Health and Medical, ProQuest Social Science and CINAHL), specialist journals and websites, and Google. The search was limited to peer-reviewed and research or instrument development articles published between January 1990 and November 2009. ‘Snowballing’ and hand searching of the references of the selected articles were also used to ensure all relevant articles were examined.Results: Ten instruments were identified as relevant for the in-depth review. The review suggested instrument development to date has tended to include the development of new domains, many of which broadly draw on the literature but are honed to the specific objectives of the study or the organization being evaluated. This has led to a diverse range of domains with broadly congruent characteristics but often with different nomenclature. Seven domains were thematically identified based on the most commonly captured aspects of the satisfaction measures reviewed; Interpersonal manner of the provider, Technical quality of care providers, Physical environment, Meals/dining, Socializing opportunities/activities/relationships with others, Spiritual services, and Organization/policy/administration. Conclusion: Further work is required to develop an instrument which addresses the gap caused by the inherently different goals of the service provider, staff and the individual client, and the differences which exist among individual clients. To assess truly person-centered approaches of care, satisfaction instruments should reflect individual client’s perceived importance and expectation on different domains of care/services. Introduction The past several decades have seen a rapid increase in the volume of health care research focusing on the measurement of patient (or consumer) satisfaction as an indicator of quality care (1). Patient satisfaction refers to the patient’s subjective view of various aspects of health care and service provided, such as the availability of personal and technical resources, interpersonal characteristics of care providers, and the care environment (2), and often depends on their level of expectation toward such care (1, 3, 4). In his seminal work on the assessment of quality care, Donabedian aptly asserts that “… information about patient satisfaction should be as indispensible to assessments of quality as to the design and management of health care systems” (5, p. 1746). Much of the existing research on the measurement of patient satisfaction as a quality care outcome indicator has taken place in the hospital (both in-patient and out-patient) and primary care settings (2, 3). However, coinciding with a growing ageing population and ever expanding consumer expectations in society, measuring the satisfaction of care recipients in residential aged care (or long-term care) is gaining more interest in the health care literature (6). There has also been an increase in the popularity and recognition of the importance of person-centered care for older people, in particular those with dementia, as a means to ensure and improve care quality (7, 8). Within a person-centered approach to care, respecting clients’ needs and wishes and involving them in care and decision making is vital, and has been linked to more positive encounters with health care services and potentially better health outcomes (9-11). However, with a few exceptions (12, 13), there has been little debate as to how the quality of aged care, underpinned by the philosophy of person-centeredness, can be reliably assessed by residents and their relatives/families (‘clients’ hereafter). Notably, the meanings attached to ‘health care’ and ‘care quality’ in residential aged
机译:背景:本文的目的是对经过验证的工具进行叙述性综述,这些工具可以衡量居民老年护理设施中客户的满意度,包括已识别工具的关键属性。方法:使用科学期刊数据库(Medline,ProQuest健康与医学,ProQuest社会科学和CINAHL),专业期刊和网站以及Google进行系统的文献检索。该搜索仅限于1990年1月至2009年11月之间发表的同行评审和研究或仪器开发文章。还对选定文章的参考文献进行了“滚雪球”和手工搜索,以确保所有相关文章均得到了检查。结果:十种仪器被确定与深入审查有关。审查认为,迄今为止,仪器的开发趋向于包括新领域的开发,其中许多领域广泛地借鉴了文献,但都针对研究或所评估组织的特定目标。这导致了具有广泛一致特征但通常具有不同命名法的各种域。根据所审查满意度指标中最常见的方面,从主题上确定了七个领域;提供者的人际关系方式,护理提供者的技术素质,身体环境,膳食/进餐,与他人进行交流的机会/活动/关系,精神服务以及组织/政策/行政管理。结论:需要做进一步的工作来开发一种工具,以解决由于服务提供商,员工和个人客户的内在不同目标以及个体客户之间存在的差异而造成的差距。为了评估真正以人为本的护理方法,满意度工具应反映出每个客户对护理/服务不同领域的感知重要性和期望。引言在过去的几十年中,医疗保健研究的数量迅速增长,其重点是衡量患者(或消费者)的满意度作为衡量优质护理的指标(1)。患者满意度是指患者对所提供的卫生保健和服务各个方面的主观看法,例如个人和技术资源的可用性,护理提供者的人际特征以及护理环境(2),并且通常取决于他们的期望水平朝着这样的关怀(1、3、4)迈进。 Donabedian在其关于质量护理评估的开创性工作中恰当地断言:“……关于患者满意度的信息对于质量评估以及医疗保健系统的设计和管理来说都是必不可少的”(5,第1746页)。在医院(住院患者和门诊患者)和基层医疗机构中,已经进行了许多有关将患者满意度作为质量护理结果指标的测量的研究(2、3)。然而,随着人口老龄化的增长和社会对消费者期望的不断提高,衡量居民对老年护理(或长期护理)满意度的方法越来越引起人们对卫生文献的关注(6)。作为确保和改善护理质量的一种手段,以人为中心的护理对老年人尤其是痴呆症老年人的重要性也越来越受到人们的重视和认可(7、8)。在以人为中心的护理方法中,尊重客户的需求和愿望并使他们参与护理和决策至关重要,这已与更积极的医疗保健服务相遇,并可能带来更好的健康结果(9-11)。然而,除了少数例外(12、13),关于以人为中心的哲学为基础的老年护理质量如何由居民及其亲戚/家人(“客户”)可靠地评估的争论很少。此后)。值得注意的是,住宅老年人中“医疗保健”和“护理质量”的含义

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号