首页> 外文期刊>The Internet Journal of Neuromonitoring >Evaluation of Cerebral Microembolic Signals in Patients with Mechanical Aortic Valves
【24h】

Evaluation of Cerebral Microembolic Signals in Patients with Mechanical Aortic Valves

机译:机械主动脉瓣患者脑微栓塞信号的评估。

获取原文
       

摘要

Background and Purpose: Microembolic Signals (MES) are frequently observed in Transcranial Doppler (TCD) recordings of patients with Mechanical Heart Valve (MHV).We hypothesized that number of MES produced by MHV could be reduced with oxygen inhalation, if gaseous bubbles are the underlying cause.Methods: All consecutive patients with St Jude aortic valves visiting the cardiology clinic were refered to the neurosonology unit, Valie Asr Hospital, Khorasan during August 2003 to August 2004. TCD monitoring of MES was performed with an ultrasound device (Vingmed 800 Oslo,Norway) and a 2 MHz probe. The MES counts were recorded during 30 minutes breathing room air and thereafter 30 minutes breathing through a facial mask with reservior bag (6 liter O2 per minute). The criteria of MES detection were characteristic chrip sound, unidirectional signal, random appearance within cardiac cycle and intensity increase ?3dB above background. The MES counts in two periods of monitoring were compared with paired T test and significance was declared at P < 0.05.Results: Twelve patients (8 females and 4 males) were investigated. Oxygen ventilation caused a significant decrease of MES counts in the patients in comarison to breathing room air, P = 0.001. Thus MES in patients with MHV are mainly gaseous bubbles caused by blood agitation with MHV.Conclusion: The quantity of MES in patients with MHV is not related to the risk of thromboembolic complications in these patients. Introduction Thromboembolism is a major cause of morbidity in patients with Mechanical Heart Valve (MHV) and Microembolic Signals (MES) are commonly observed in TCD recording of these patients1. Since at present the precise nature of MES in patients with MHV is unknown, different etiologies are under debate including local activation of coagulation system by the MHV, local increase of platelet aggregation and gaseous cavitation bubbles2. A major drawback of TCD technology is its failure to provide conclusive information concerning the underlying embolic material1. This issue is important in the evaluation of individual risk profiles and adequate management strategies. No correlations have been found between MES count and duration after MHV replacement, valve position, cardiac rhythm, intensity of anticoagulation and history of neurological deficit3,4. Assumption of gaseous bubbles as embolic material could explain this dicripancy, since microbubbles remain asymptomatic by imploding or crossing over to venous circulation through the capillary bed4. Patients with MHV had higher MES counts in common carotid artery than middle and anterior cerebral arteries because gaseous bubble emboli are bound to implode with time5. This study was carried out to evaluate the influence of oxygen ventilation on MES counts in patients with mechanical aortic valves. Patients and Methods All consecutive patients with St Jude mechanical valves in aortic position were referred from the cardiology clinic to the neurosonology unit, Valie Asr Hospital, Khorasan during August 2003 to August 2004. Presence of more than 70% extracranial internal carotid artery stenosis, poor transtemporal window and intolerance to oxygen ventilation for 30 minutes served as exclusion criteria. The protocol entailed 30 minutes of TCD monitoring while the patient was breathing room air and 30 minutes while breathing 6 liters per minute oxygen through a facial mask with a reservior bag (fractional inspiratory O2 = 60%)6. This facial mask was placed over mouth and nose and held in place by an examiner, providing downward pressure with thumb to ensure a tight seal6. Patients were instructed to breath normally, avoid hypo or hyperventilation and immediately give notice if breathing become uncomfortable or other inspiratory or cardiac complaints occurred. MES monitoring was performed with an ultrasound device (Vingmed 800, Oslo, Norway) and a 2MHz probe in 50-58 mm depth of right middle cerebral artery through transtemporal window. M
机译:背景与目的:在机械性心脏瓣膜病(MHV)患者的经颅多普勒(TCD)记录中经常观察到微栓塞信号(MES)。我们假设,如果气泡为气泡,则吸入氧气可减少MHV产生的MES数量。方法:在2003年8月至2004年8月期间,将所有连续来访的St Jude主动脉瓣的患者转诊至心脏病学诊所的霍兰大学瓦莱阿瑟医院神经超声科。用超声设备对MES进行TCD监测(Vingmed 800 Oslo (挪威)和一个2 MHz探头。在呼吸室内空气30分钟后记录此MES计数,然后在30分钟内通过带储物袋的面罩呼吸(每分钟6升氧气)。 MES检测的标准是特征性的声,单向信号,心动周期内的随机出现以及强度比背景高出3dB。将两个监测阶段的MES计数与配对T检验进行比较,并在P <0.05时宣布显着性。结果:调查了12例患者(女性8例,男性4例)。与呼吸室内空气相比,氧气通气导致患者的MES计数显着下降,P = 0.001。因此,MHV患者的MES主要是由MHV血液激动引起的气泡。结论:MHV患者的MES含量与这些患者的血栓栓塞并发症风险无关。引言血栓栓塞是机械性心脏瓣膜病(MHV)患者发病的主要原因,在这些患者的TCD记录中通常观察到微栓塞信号(MES)1。由于目前尚不清楚MHV患者MES的确切性质,因此各种病因仍在争论中,包括MHV对凝血系统的局部激活,血小板凝集的局部增加和气穴现象2。 TCD技术的主要缺点是无法提供有关潜在栓塞材料的结论性信息1。这个问题对于评估个人风险状况和适当的管理策略很重要。在MES计数与MHV更换后的持续时间,瓣膜位置,心律,抗凝强度和神经功能缺损史之间没有发现相关性3,4。假定气泡作为栓塞材料可以解释这种差异,因为微气泡通过通过毛细血管床内插或穿过静脉循环而保持无症状。 MHV患者在颈总动脉中的MES计数高于大脑中动脉和前动脉,因为随着时间的流逝,气泡性栓塞势必会破裂。这项研究旨在评估氧气通气对机械性主动脉瓣患者的MES计数的影响。患者和方法自2003年8月至2004年8月,所有连续的主动脉瓣St Jude机械瓣膜患者均从心脏病诊所转到霍拉桑Valie Asr医院神经超声科。存在70%以上的颅外颈内动脉狭窄,不良跨颞窗和对氧气通气不耐受30分钟作为排除标准。该方案需要在患者呼吸室内空气时进行30分钟的TCD监测,并在通过带有储物袋的面罩(每分钟吸气O2 = 60%)时每分钟呼吸6升氧气来监测30分钟。将该面膜放在嘴和鼻子上,并由检查员将其固定在位,用拇指向下施加压力以确保紧密密封6。指导患者正常呼吸,避免过度通气或过度换气,如果呼吸不舒服或发生其他吸气或心脏不适,应立即发出通知。 MES监测是通过超声设备(挪威奥斯陆的Vingmed 800)和2MHz探头通过颞颞窗在右中脑动脉50-58 mm深度进行的。中号

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号