...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics >Porcelain repair - Influence of different systems and surface treatments on resin bond strength
【24h】

Porcelain repair - Influence of different systems and surface treatments on resin bond strength

机译:瓷修复-不同体系和表面处理对树脂粘结强度的影响

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to evaluate the bond strength of composite resin on the fracture surface of metal-ceramic depending on the repair systems and surface roughening methods. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 30 disk specimens were fabricated, 15 of each were made from feldspathic porcelain and nickel-chromium base metal alloy. Each substrate was divided into three groups according to the repair method: a) application of repair system I (Intraoral Repair Kit) with diamond bur roughening (Group DP and DM), b) application of repair system I with airborne-particle abrasion (Group SP and SM), and c) application of repair system II (CoJet Intraoral Repair System, Group CP and CM). All specimens were thermocycled, and the shear bond strength was measured. The data were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis analysis and the Mann-Whitney test with a significance level of 0.05. RESULTS For the porcelain specimens, group SP showed the highest shear bond strength (25.85 ± 3.51 MPa) and group DP and CP were not significantly different. In metal specimens, group CM showed superior values of bond strength (13.81 ± 3.45 MPa) compared to groups DM or SM. CONCLUSION Airborne-particle abrasion and application of repair system I can be recommended in the case of a fracture localized to the porcelain. If the fracture extends to metal surface, the repair system II is worthy of consideration.
机译:目的本研究的目的是根据修复系统和表面粗糙化方法评估复合树脂在金属陶瓷断裂表面上的粘结强度。材料与方法总共制作了30个圆盘样品,每个样品由长石瓷和镍铬基金属合金制成。根据修复方法,将每种基材分为三组:a)应用金刚石粗锉打磨的修复系统I(口内修复套件)(DP和DM组),b)应用气载颗粒磨蚀的修复系统I(组I) SP和SM),以及c)修复系统II(CoJet口腔内修复系统,CP和CM组)的应用。将所有样品进行热循环,并测量剪切粘合强度。使用Kruskal-Wallis分析和Mann-Whitney检验分析数据,显着性水平为0.05。结果对于瓷标本,SP组显示出最高的剪切粘结强度(25.85±3.51 MPa),而DP和CP组没有显着差异。在金属样品中,与DM或SM组相比,CM组的粘结强度值更高(13.81±3.45 MPa)。结论如果陶瓷局部断裂,建议使用气载颗粒磨损和修复系统I。如果裂缝扩展到金属表面,则修复系统II是值得考虑的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号