首页> 外文期刊>The Internet Journal of Pathology >Morphological and Immunophenotypical Characterization of “Breast Carcinomas In Situ With Mixed Pattern” By Using E-Cadherin and β-Catenin
【24h】

Morphological and Immunophenotypical Characterization of “Breast Carcinomas In Situ With Mixed Pattern” By Using E-Cadherin and β-Catenin

机译:E-钙粘蛋白和β-连环蛋白对“原位混合型乳腺癌”的形态学和免疫表型特征

获取原文
       

摘要

Background: The distinction between lobular neoplasia of the breast and ductal carcinoma in situ has important therapeutic implications. In some cases, it is very difficult to determine whether the morphology of the lesion is ductal or lobular. The aim of this study was to evaluate the value of E-cadherin and β-catenin expression through the immune phenotypical characterization of carcinoma in situ with mixed pattern (CISM).Methods: A total of 25 cases of CISM were analyzed considering cytology/mixed architecture (ductal and lobular), nuclear pleomorphism, loss of cell cohesion, and presence of comedo necrosis. The immunophenotype pattern was considered E-cadherin positive and β-catenin positive, or negative.Results: Nineteen (76%) cases presented a mixed cytology and / or architectural pattern, two (8%) presented nuclear pleomorphism, two (8%) presented mixed cytology and nuclear pleomorphism, and two (8%) presented comedo necrosis and nuclear pleomorphism. A complete positivity for E-cadherin and β-catenin was observed in 11cases (44%). In one case, the lesion was negative for both markers and showed nuclear pleomorphis. Thirteen lesions showed negative staining in areas of lobular cytology and positive staining in cells presenting the ductal pattern.Conclusions: The expression of E-cadherin and β-catenin, combined with cytological and architectural analysis, may highlight different immunophenotypes and improve classification of CISM. INTRODUCTION: In situ breast carcinomas are classified, according to their morphology, as ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) or lobular neoplasia (LN), which includes lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) and atypical lobular hyperplasia (ALH). According to the 2012 WHO classification of tumors of the breast, classic LCIS is diagnosed when more than half of the acini of a lobular unit are distended and distorted by a discohesive proliferation of cells with small,uniform nuclei. Lesser involvement by the characteristic cells is diagnosed as ALH. Lesions that show marked nuclear pleomorphism, with or without apocrine features and comedo necrosis are referred as pleomorphic LCIS (PLCIS) [1]. In some cases, the diagnostic criteria based on the morphology of LN are not clear, leading to mistaken diagnosis of intraductal proliferative lesions. The main differential diagnoses of lobular neoplasia are: LN with solid low-grade DCIS, PLCIS and high-grade DCIS. Some in situ carcinomas present unusual cytological and / or architectural features, making it difficult to determine whether the proliferation is lobular or ductal. This group has been called carcinomas in situ with a mixed or indeterminate pattern (CISM) [2, 3].The differential diagnosis of the CISM carries some important implications. Patients with LN are usually clinically monitored and can be offered tamoxifen as a prophylactic therapy to prevent the development of invasive carcinoma [4, 5]. On other hand, patients with DCIS should be treated by surgical removal of the lesion, with clear margins followed by radiotherapy, or mastectomy [6]. When diagnosed by core biopsy, DCIS should betreated with complete excision of the lesion. However, the clinical significance and therapeutic implications of finding LN in core biopsy specimens are still controversial [7, 8].The diagnosis of CISM is extremely rare and studies assessing the differential diagnosis of these lesions are scarce and include only a few patients. The largest series reported between 12 and 28 cases [9, 10]. Previous studies by our group identified 0.08% of CISM among breast biopsies performed in our general hospital [11]. Although rare, when analyzed under light microscope, the CISM lesions are difficult to diagnose and there is lack of epidemiological data linked to their biological behavior. A great progress in the diagnosis of these lesions came with the observation that almost all cases of LN and invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) lose the immunohistochemistry (IHC) signal for E-cadherin a
机译:背景:乳腺小叶增生与导管癌的区别具有重要的治疗意义。在某些情况下,很难确定病变的形态是导管还是小叶。本研究旨在通过原位癌混合型免疫表型(CISM)的免疫表型特征评价E-cadherin和β-catenin表达的价值。方法:考虑细胞学/混合型共分析25例CISM病例。构型(导管和小叶),核多态性,细胞内聚力丧失和粉刺坏死的存在。免疫表型模式被认为是E-钙粘蛋白阳性和β-catenin阳性或阴性。结果:十九例(76%)出现了混合的细胞学和/或结构模式,两个(8%)出现了核多态性,两个(8%)提出了混合细胞学和核多态性,两个(8%)提出了粉刺坏死和核多态性。在11例病例中(44%)观察到E-钙粘蛋白和β-连环蛋白完全阳性。在一种情况下,两个标记物的病变均为阴性,并显示核多形性。十三个病变在小叶细胞学区域呈阴性染色,在呈导管样样的细胞中呈阳性染色。结论:E-钙黏着蛋白和β-连环蛋白的表达,结合细胞学和结构分析,可能会突出显示不同的免疫表型并改善CISM的分类。简介:原位乳腺癌根据其形态分类为导管原位癌(DCIS)或小叶赘生瘤(LN),其中包括小叶原位癌(LCIS)和非典型小叶增生(ALH)。根据2012年WHO对乳腺肿瘤的分类,当小叶核的小细胞不规则增殖而使小叶单位的腺泡的一半以上扩张或扭曲时,诊断为经典LCIS。特征细胞的较少参与被诊断为ALH。表现出明显核多态性,伴有或不伴有高教特征和粉刺坏死的病变称为多形LCIS(PLCIS)[1]。在某些情况下,基于LN形态的诊断标准尚不明确,导致误诊为导管内增生性病变。小叶肿瘤的主要鉴别诊断为:LN伴实性低度DCIS,PLCIS和高度DCIS。一些原位癌表现出异常的细胞学和/或结构特征,使得难以确定增殖是小叶的还是导管的。该组被称为原位癌,具有混合或不确定模式(CISM)[2,3]。CISM的鉴别诊断具有重要意义。通常对LN患者进行临床监测,可以为他莫昔芬提供预防性疗法,以预防浸润性癌的发展[4,5]。另一方面,DCIS患者应通过手术切除病灶,切缘清楚,然后进行放射治疗或乳房切除术来治疗[6]。当通过核心活检诊断为DCIS时,应完全切除病灶。然而,在核心活检标本中发现LN的临床意义和治疗意义仍存在争议[7,8]。CISM的诊断极为罕见,评估这些病变的鉴别诊断的研究很少,仅包括少数患者。最大的系列报道12到28例[9,10]。我们小组以前的研究发现,在我们的综合医院进行的乳房活检中,CISM占0.08%[11]。尽管很少见,但在光学显微镜下分析时,CISM病变很难诊断,并且缺乏与其生物学行为相关的流行病学数据。这些病的诊断取得了巨大进展,因为观察到几乎所有LN和浸润性小叶癌(ILC)病例都丧失了E-钙粘蛋白a的免疫组化(IHC)信号。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号