首页> 外文期刊>The Internet Journal of Medical Informatics >Collecting Data From Physicians Via Web-Based Surveys: Recommendations for Improving Response Rates
【24h】

Collecting Data From Physicians Via Web-Based Surveys: Recommendations for Improving Response Rates

机译:通过基于Web的调查从医师那里收集数据:提高响应率的建议

获取原文
           

摘要

Advances in technology have increased the utility of online data collection strategies. Although this approach to gathering information is widely utilized, limitations do exist. The authors utilized an online methodology during a recent study designed to assess physician knowledge regarding policy and law related to HIV/AIDS, however a sufficient response rate was never attained. In light of this failure a secondary study was conducted (discussed herein) to examine the underlying mechanics behind this deficiency. Focus groups were conducted to understand why physicians failed to participate. Subjects identified lack of survey notification and perceived relevance of the research question to their profession as important factors. Results also indicate that future online surveys should accompany immediate feedback and guaranteed incentives, target specific clinical areas, be short and user-friendly, and announced using a multi-level approach. Although quite useful as a method of data collection, limitations of online data acquisition are many and should be examined thoroughly prior to test administration Introduction For the past decade the Internet has served as a conduit for the global dissemination of information, allowing for the rapid distribution of research data via the World Wide Web. More recently this venue has been exploited for the collection of research data as well. Advances in technology and the omnipresence of both computers and individual access to the Internet have increased the potential effectiveness of online data collection strategies. Benefits of this approach may include increased accuracy of data entry, timely collection of participant responses, and a reduction in costs specific to survey replication. Indeed, the literature offers support for the use of Internet-assisted distribution of information as well as data collection. For example, Tate, Wing, and Winett (1) used the Internet to deliver a behavioral weight loss program where participants received instructional material via electronic mail, submitted online dietary progress reports, and communicated with others through an online bulletin board. Similarly, Baehring, Schulze, Bornstein, & Scherbaum (2) constructed an online assessment tool to assist in the identification of those with undiagnosed non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus. A web-based approach was also used by Pereira, Bruera and Quan (3) in collecting data from 417 palliative care health professionals regarding their use of the Internet. In terms of online survey efficacy, a number of authors have discussed their successes at obtaining data. In a study regarding the opinions of emergency physicians on the use of emergency ultrasound, Blaivas (4) gathered data via an anonymous online survey from 1,600 physicians yielding a response rate of 63%. In a similar study of emergency medicine residency applicants, data were collected from 138 of a possible 250 subjects, a response rate of 55%. (5) Evidence also exists that online modalities may be as effective at conducting psychological experiments compared to lab-based experiments, lending additional support for the utility of the electronic medium. (6) Other authors have reported similar findings (7).Although the literature discusses the possibility of the anonymous online survey becoming a commonly used tool in research, few authors discuss the deficiencies, biases, and limitations of this methodology especially from a first hand perspective. Like other methods of data collection, bias is an issue to be considered. For example, bias is introduced when data are collected electronically with disregard for those who lack computer skills or technology sufficient to complete the instrument. Error also emerges when computers are used to collect information compared to traditional paper and pencil approaches. To examine this type of bias Yates, Wagner, and Suprenant (8) reported a comparative study in which 63 undergraduate males and females were
机译:技术的进步增加了在线数据收集策略的实用性。尽管这种收集信息的方法被广泛使用,但确实存在局限性。在最近的一项研究中,作者利用一种在线方法来评估医生对与艾滋病毒/艾滋病有关的政策和法律的知识,但是,从未获得足够的回应率。鉴于这种失败,进行了二次研究(在此讨论),以检查这种缺陷背后的潜在机制。进行了焦点小组会议,以了解为什么医生未能参加。受试者发现缺乏调查通知,并且认为研究问题与其专业相关性是重要因素。结果还表明,未来的在线调查应伴随着即时反馈和有保证的激励机制,针对特定的临床领域,简短且易于使用,并采用多层次的方法予以宣布。尽管作为数据收集方法非常有用,但在线数据获取的局限性很多,应在进行测试管理之前进行彻底检查。简介在过去的十年中,Internet充当了信息在全球范围内传播的渠道,可以快速传播通过万维网收集研究数据。最近,该场所也被用于收集研究数据。技术的进步和计算机的普及以及个人对互联网的访问已经提高了在线数据收集策略的潜在有效性。这种方法的好处可能包括提高数据输入的准确性,及时收集参与者的回答,并降低调查复制所特有的成本。实际上,文献为使用Internet辅助的信息分发以及数据收集提供了支持。例如,Tate,Wing和Winett(1)使用Internet实施了行为减肥计划,参与者可以通过电子邮件接收指导材料,提交在线饮食进度报告,并通过在线公告板与他人进行沟通。同样,Baehring,Schulze,Bornstein和Scherbaum(2)构建了一个在线评估工具,以帮助鉴定那些未经诊断的非胰岛素依赖型糖尿病患者。 Pereira,Bruera和Quan(3)也使用基于网络的方法从417名姑息治疗保健专业人员那里收集有关互联网使用的数据。关于在线调查的有效性,许多作者讨论了他们在获取数据方面的成功。在一项有关急诊医师对使用急诊超声的意见的研究中,Blaivas(4)通过匿名在线调查收集了来自1,600位医师的数据,反应率为63%。在一项类似的急诊医学住院医师申请者研究中,从250位受试者中的138位收集了数据,回复率为55%。 (5)还有证据表明,在线模式与基于实验室的实验相比,在进行心理实验方面可能同样有效,这为电子媒体的实用性提供了额外的支持。 (6)其他作者也报告了类似的发现(7)。尽管文献讨论了匿名在线调查成为研究中常用工具的可能性,但很少有人讨论这种方法的不足,偏差和局限性,特别是从第一手开始透视。与其他数据收集方法一样,偏差是一个需要考虑的问题。例如,当以电子方式收集数据而忽略那些缺乏足够计算机技术或技术来完善仪器的人时,就会引入偏差。与传统的纸张和铅笔方法相比,使用计算机收集信息时也会出现错误。为了检验这种偏见,Yates,Wagner和Suprenant(8)报告了一项比较研究,其中63名本科生男女

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号