...
首页> 外文期刊>The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology >ECT Has Greater Efficacy Than Fluoxetine in Alleviating the Burden of Illness for Patients with Major Depressive Disorder: A Taiwanese Pooled Analysis
【24h】

ECT Has Greater Efficacy Than Fluoxetine in Alleviating the Burden of Illness for Patients with Major Depressive Disorder: A Taiwanese Pooled Analysis

机译:ECT在减轻重度抑郁症患者疾病负担方面的疗效优于氟西汀:台湾汇总分析

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background The burden of major depressive disorder includes suffering due to symptom severity, functional impairment, and quality of life deficits. The aim of this study was to compare the differences between electroconvulsive therapy and pharmacotherapy in reducing such burdens. Methods This was a pooled analysis study including 2 open-label trials for major depressive disorder inpatients receiving either standard bitemporal and modified electroconvulsive therapy with a maximum of 12 sessions or 20 mg/d of fluoxetine for 6 weeks. Symptom severity, functioning, and quality of life were assessed using the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, the Modified Work and Social Adjustment Scale, and SF-36. Side effects following treatment, including subjective memory impairment, nausea/vomiting, and headache, were recorded. The differences between these 2 groups in 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, Modified Work and Social Adjustment Scale, quality of life, side effects, and time to response (at least a 50% reduction of 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression) and remission (17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression ≤7) following treatment were analyzed. Results Electroconvulsive therapy (n=116) showed a significantly greater reduction in 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, Modified Work and Social Adjustment Scale, and quality of life deficits and had significantly shorter time to response/remission than fluoxetine (n=126). However, the electroconvulsive therapy group was more likely to experience subjective memory impairment and headache. Conclusions Compared with fluoxetine, electroconvulsive therapy was more effective in alleviating the burden of major depressive disorder and had a substantially increased speed of response/remission in the acute phase. Increased education and information about electroconvulsive therapy for clinicians, patients, and their families and the general public is warranted. major depressive disorder , electroconvulsive therapy , fluoxetine , response , remission Significance Statement The results of research conducted in an Asian country revealed that ECT was more effective in reducing the burden of acute phase depression than fluoxetine. Patients with treatment-resistant depression were excluded from the fluoxetine 20 mg group. ECT had a substantially increased speed of symptomatic response and remission compared with fluoxetine, although the ECT group had a higher rate of treatment-resistant depression (86.2%) and experienced more subjective memory impairment and headache, while other side effects were not systematically evaluated in the pooled analysis.
机译:背景严重抑郁症的负担包括因症状严重,功能障碍和生活质量低下引起的痛苦。这项研究的目的是比较电抽搐疗法和药物疗法在减轻此类负担方面的差异。方法这是一项汇总分析研究,包括2项针对标准抑郁症住院患者的标准研究,这些患者接受标准双时相和改良电抽搐治疗,最多接受12次疗程或20 mg / d氟西汀治疗,持续6周。症状严重程度,功能和生活质量使用17个项目的汉密尔顿抑郁量表,改良工作和社会适应量表和SF-36进行评估。记录治疗后的副作用,包括主观记忆障碍,恶心/呕吐和头痛。这两组之间的差异包括17个项目的汉密尔顿抑郁量表,改良工作和社会适应量表,生活质量,副作用和反应时间(17个项目的汉密尔顿抑郁量表至少减少了50% )并分析治疗后的缓解(抑郁症≤17项汉密尔顿评定量表≤7)。结果电惊厥疗法(n = 116)显示抑郁症的汉密尔顿抑郁量表,改良工作和社会适应量表以及生活质量下降的17项评分显着更大,且响应/缓解时间明显短于氟西汀(n = 126) )。但是,电惊厥治疗组更容易发生主观记忆障碍和头痛。结论与氟西汀相比,电抽搐疗法在减轻重度抑郁症方面更有效,并且在急性期的反应/缓解速度大大提高。有必要为临床医生,患者及其家人和公众增加有关电痉挛治疗的教育和信息。重度抑郁症,电惊厥疗法,氟西汀,反应,缓解意义声明在一个亚洲国家进行的研究结果表明,ECT比氟西汀在减轻急性期抑郁症负担方面更为有效。难治性抑郁症患者从氟西汀20 mg组中排除。与氟西汀相比,ECT的症状反应和缓解速度显着提高,尽管ECT组的耐抑郁症发生率较高(86.2%),主观记忆障碍和头痛更为严重,而其他副作用并未进行系统评估。汇总分析。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号