首页> 外文期刊>The Internet Journal of Third World Medicine >Gastroenterologist versus Surgeon Performed Endoscopic Gastrostomy: A Multi-Centre Comparative Study.
【24h】

Gastroenterologist versus Surgeon Performed Endoscopic Gastrostomy: A Multi-Centre Comparative Study.

机译:肠胃科医生与外科医生进行内镜胃造口术:多中心比较研究。

获取原文
           

摘要

PEG tube placement has been widely embraced by endoscopists as a means of accessing the gastrointestinal tract for feeding. In this study we compared the outcomes of PEG tube placement by gastroenterologists and surgeon endoscopists.Materials and MethodsData on PEG outcomes were retrospectively collected over 31 months from the Georgetown Hospital in the Cayman Islands where PEGs were performed exclusively by surgeons. This was compared with data collected over the same period from the University Hospital of the West Indies in Jamaica where PEGs were performed exclusively by gastroenterologists.ResultsThere were 74 PEG tubes placed by gastroenterologists and 35 placed by surgeons. The gastroenterologists had a higher collective case volume than surgeons (37 vs 18 cases per year). There were no significant differences between gastroenterologist and surgeon performed PEG in terms of procedural success (98.6% vs 100%; P=0.84), overall morbidity (6.8% vs 8.8%; P=0.71), early mortality (4.3% vs 0; P=0.549) or late mortality (11.8% Vs 0; P=0.049).ConclusionsAppropriately trained surgeon endoscopists and gastroenterologists can site PEG tubes with similar success and complication rates. Introduction PEG tube placement has been widely embraced by endoscopists as a means to access the gastrointestinal (GI) tract for feeding. The technique is becoming increasingly popular in many Caribbean territories (1-3). At the University Hospital of the West Indies (UHWI) in Jamaica, gastroenterologists have been performing PEG tube placement since 1999 (1). Surgeons have not become involved in this practice largely because endoscopic training is not incorporated into surgical post-graduate programmes at the UHWI. In contrast, most North American and European training centres incorporate endoscopic procedures into their surgical residency programmes (4). In these settings, surgeons perform several diagnostic and therapeutic upper and lower GI endoscopies, including PEG.We carried out this comparative study of PEG tube placement between the two disciplines to determine the safety of this practice by surgeon endoscopists. Since this practice has not yet become realized at the UHWI, data from the Cayman Islands were used as controls for surgeon-performed PEG. Materials And Methods Data on PEG tube placement were retrospectively collected over a period of 31 months from January 2005 to August 2007. The hospital records of all patients who had PEG placement during the study periods were retrieved for analysis. Records were collected from the UWHI in Jamaica where PEG placement were performed exclusively by gastroenterologists and from the Georgetown Hospital in the Cayman Islands where PEG tubes were placed exclusively by surgeons. Patients who were transferred from other hospitals for this service were excluded from the final analysis as their records would not be available for review.The standard “pull technique” was utilized at both centers with one of several commercially available PEG introduction systems: Freka? PEG Set (Fresenius Ltd, Warrington, UK); Ponsky? PEG Kit (Bard Endoscopic Technologies, Massachusetts, USA); Cook? PEG Kit (Wilson-Cook Medical Inc, North Carolina, USA). Prophylactic antibiotics were routinely used at both hospitals. The operative techniques have already been detailed in previous reports (1, 3). The data collected included case volume, success rates, PEG-specific morbidity, and early mortality. These data were entered in a Microsoft Excel? worksheet and analyzed using SPSS version 12.0. The outcomes were assessed by Pearson’s Chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests. Significance was considered present with a two-tailed P value < 0.05. Results There were 35 surgeon-led procedures identified during the study period. There were 15 males and 20 females, with ages ranging from 49 to 92 years (Mean +/-SD: 77+/-14.4). Hospital records were retrieved for all the patients for detailed analysis. The operations were performed by one of
机译:内窥镜医师已将PEG管放置作为进入胃肠道进行喂养的一种手段。在这项研究中,我们比较了肠胃科医生和胃镜医师对PEG管放置的结果。材料和方法回顾性分析PEG结局的数据,历时31个月,是从开曼群岛的乔治敦医院(Georgetown Hospital)进行的,PEG是由外科医生专门进行的。将其与同期从牙买加西印度大学医院收集的数据进行比较,那里的PEG仅由肠胃科医生进行。结果,肠胃科医生放置了74根PEG管,外科医生放置了35根。肠胃病患者的集体病例数量比外科医生多(每年37例,相比18例)。在手术成功率(98.6%vs 100%; P = 0.84),总发病率(6.8%vs 8.8%; P = 0.71),早期死亡率(4.3%vs 0;总发病率)方面,胃肠科医生和外科医生进行PEG均无显着差异。 P = 0.549)或晚期死亡率(11.8%Vs 0; P = 0.049)。结论经过适当培训的内镜医师和胃肠病医师可以对PEG管进行成功和并发症发生率相似的定位。引言内镜医师已将PEG管放置作为进入胃肠道(GI)进行喂养的一种手段。该技术在加勒比海许多地区越来越受欢迎(1-3)。自1999年以来,在牙买加的西印度群岛大学医院(UHWI),肠胃病医生一直在进行PEG管的植入(1)。外科医生并未参与这一实践,主要是因为内窥镜训练未纳入UHWI的外科研究生课程。相比之下,大多数北美和欧洲的培训中心都将内窥镜检查程序纳入了他们的外科住院计划(4)。在这些情况下,外科医生会进行包括PEG在内的多种诊断和治疗上,下胃肠道内窥镜检查。我们对这两个学科之间进行PEG管放置进行了比较研究,以确定外科医生的内镜医师这样做的安全性。由于这种做法尚未在UHWI上实现,因此将开曼群岛的数据用作外科医生进行PEG的对照。材料与方法回顾性收集2005年1月至2007年8月这31个月内PEG管放置的数据。检索研究期间所有PEG放置患者的医院记录以进行分析。记录是从牙买加的UWHI收集的,那里仅由肠胃科医生进行PEG的放置,还从开曼群岛的乔治敦医院(仅由外科医生放置PEG的管)收集了记录。从其他医院转来接受此项服务的患者将无法进行最终分析,因为他们的记录将无法审查。两个中心都使用标准的“拉动技术”,使用了几种市售PEG引入系统之一:Freka? PEG Set(Fresenius Ltd,英国沃灵顿);庞斯基PEG试剂盒(美国马萨诸塞州巴德内窥镜技术公司);厨师? PEG试剂盒(Wilson-Cook Medical Inc,美国北卡罗来纳州)。两家医院都常规使用预防性抗生素。手术技术已在以前的报告中详细介绍过(1、3)。收集的数据包括病例数,成功率,PEG特异性发病率和早期死亡率。这些数据是在Microsoft Excel中输入的吗?工作表并使用SPSS 12.0版进行了分析。结果通过Pearson的卡方检验和Fisher的精确检验进行了评估。两尾P值<0.05表示存在显着性。结果在研究期间,确定了35种由外科医生主导的程序。男15例,女20例,年龄49-92岁(平均+/- SD:77 +/- 14.4)。检索所有患者的医院记录以进行详细分析。该操作由以下人员之一执行

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号