首页> 外文期刊>The Internet Journal of Surgery >Frequency And Risk Factor Assessment Of Port-Site Infection After Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy In Low-Risk Patients At A Tertiary Care Hospital Of Kashmir.
【24h】

Frequency And Risk Factor Assessment Of Port-Site Infection After Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy In Low-Risk Patients At A Tertiary Care Hospital Of Kashmir.

机译:克什米尔一家三级医院低危患者接受选择性腹腔镜胆囊切除术后港口感染的频率和危险因素评估。

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background and objectives: The study was conducted with the aim to determine frequency and to assess the risk factors of port-site infection after elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy in low-risk patients at a tertiary care hospital of Kashmir.Design and Setting: Prospective.Patients and Methods : The study included 675 consecutive patients of port-site infection after elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy for symptomatic cholelithiasis over a period of 12 months. Culture swabs were taken from port sites of all patients with signs of port site infection and transported to the microbiology laboratory. The positive swab cultures were noted. The risk factors like iatrogenic gallbladder perforation, two port method, experience of surgeon and age of the patients were assessed. The data obtained was analyzed by using appropriate statistical analytical tests. Results: The incidence of port-site infection after elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy is 6.7%. The port site infection is more often superficial and at the epigastric port site, associated with iatrogenic gallbladder perforation and more likely when laparoscopic cholecystectomy is performed by a junior surgeon and by two port method. Conclusion: The primary risk factor for port-site infection after elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy in otherwise normal patients is iatrogenic gallbladder perforation leading to spillage of bile. Introduction Surgical procedures often lead to both intrinsic and extrinsic infections. The human body enables survival of a wide variety of microorganisms with potential for causing infection. In circumstances where systemic host resistance is lowered, such as immuno-suppression from medication and disruption of intact cutaneous or mucous membranes as a result of surgical procedures or trauma, patients’ bacterial flora may become opportunistic and cause infection. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has become the preferred method of performing gallbladder surgery in present era. Laparoscopic cholecystectomies are associated with shorter hospital stay and convalescence, less pain and scarring, and lower rates of postoperative surgical site infection (SSI) than open cholecystectomies.1-4 The fact that laparoscopic cholecystectomies are associated with fewer surgical site infections (SSIs) intuitively makes sense as laparoscopy access ports are short in length and only a fraction of the length of the incision used in open laparotomy. Elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy has a low risk for infection1-5, but many surgeons still use prophylactic antibiotics. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention classification (CDC) categorized surgical site infection into incision-site infection and organ-space infection. The incision-site infection is further subdivided into “superficial” in which only skin and subcutaneous tissue is infected and “deep” where fascia and muscles are infected.5, 6 This study was designed to determine the port (incision) site infection rate and assessment of the risk factors for port-site infection in low-risk patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Patients and Methods The study included 675 consecutive patients of postoperative port-site infection after elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy for symptomatic cholelithiasis in surgical units of our hospital over a period of 12 months from 1 st April 2010 to 31st March 2011 in the Department of Surgery Government Medical College Srinagar. In order to minimize the bias in our observations, the following patients were excluded: 1) patients with chronic debilitating illnesses and with known malignancies as their chances of port-site infection are higher because of their immunocompromised state, 2) patients in extremes of age because the chance of infection in them is higher, 3) patients with acute cholecystitis as it increases the chance of infection, 4) patients with antibiotic prophylaxis because antibiotics decrease the chance of infection, and 5) patients with port-
机译:背景与目的:本研究旨在确定克什米尔一家三级医院低危患者择期腹腔镜胆囊切除术后发生频率和评估港口感染的危险因素设计和设置:前瞻性。方法:该研究纳入了选择性腹腔镜胆囊切除术后连续675个月的有症状胆囊结石的连续位点感染患者,为期12个月。从所有有港口感染迹象的患者的港口采集培养拭子,并将其运送到微生物实验室。注意到阳性拭子培养。评估了诸如医源性胆囊穿孔,两种端口方法,外科医生的经验和患者年龄等危险因素。通过使用适当的统计分析测试来分析获得的数据。结果:择期腹腔镜胆囊切除术后港口感染的发生率为6.7%。港口部位感染多发于浅表,位于上腹部港口部位,与医源性胆囊穿孔有关,当由初级外科医生和两端口方法进行腹腔镜胆囊切除术时,感染的可能性更大。结论:在其他正常患者中,选择性腹腔镜胆囊切除术后港口感染的主要危险因素是医源性胆囊穿孔,导致胆汁溢出。简介外科手术通常会导致内在和外在感染。人体使多种微生物得以存活,并可能引起感染。在全身宿主抵抗力降低的情况下,例如由于药物治疗导致的免疫抑制以及由于外科手术或创伤导致的完整皮肤或粘膜破坏,患者的细菌菌群可能会变成机会并引起感染。腹腔镜胆囊切除术已成为当今时代进行胆囊手术的首选方法。与开放性胆囊切除术相比,腹腔镜胆囊切除术与住院时间短,恢复期短,疼痛和疤痕少,术后手术部位感染(SSI)的发生率低1-4有关。事实上,腹腔镜胆囊切除术与较少的手术部位感染(SSI)相关。腹腔镜检修口的长度较短,并且仅是开放式剖腹术中所用切口长度的一小部分,因此很有意义。选择性腹腔镜胆囊切除术感染的风险较低1-5,但许多外科医生仍在使用预防性抗生素。疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)将手术部位感染分为切口部位感染和器官间隙感染。切口部位感染可进一步细分为仅感染皮肤和皮下组织的“浅表”感染和筋膜和肌肉感染的“较深”感染。5,6本研究旨在确定口(切口)部位感染率和选择性腹腔镜胆囊切除术低危患者港口感染的危险因素评估。患者与方法:本研究包括从2010年4月1日至2011年3月31日在我院外科部门进行的为期12个月的选择性腹腔镜胆囊切除术后有症状的胆石症的675例术后港口感染的患者。斯利那加大学。为了最大程度地减少我们的观察结果的偏倚,以下患者被排除在外:1)患有慢性衰弱性疾病且患有恶性肿瘤的患者,由于其免疫功能低下,其发生原位感染的机会更高,2)处于极端年龄的患者因为它们中被感染的机会更高; 3)急性胆囊炎患者,因为它增加了感染的机会; 4)由于抗生素减少了感染的机会而进行了抗生素预防的患者;以及5)患有Port-

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号