首页> 外文期刊>The Internet Journal of Third World Medicine >Determining the Attitudes of a Rural Community in Penang, Malaysia towards Mental Illness and Community-Based Psychiatric Care
【24h】

Determining the Attitudes of a Rural Community in Penang, Malaysia towards Mental Illness and Community-Based Psychiatric Care

机译:确定马来西亚槟城农村社区对心理疾病和基于社区的精神病护理的态度

获取原文
       

摘要

Introduction: Historical attitudes toward mental illness have been one of stigmatisation. This has serious implications for patients as it disadvantages them in aspects of daily living and leads to delay in seeking and in defaulting treatment. Aim: The objective of this study was to determine the attitudes of a rural community in Penang, Malaysia towards various aspects of mental illness and towards community-based mental health facilities. Materials and Methods: A Malay version of Community Attitudes toward Mental Illness-Swedish (CAMI-S) questionnaire was used as a tool to achieve the objective of this ethically conducted cross sectional study. The results were analysed descriptively using PASW Statistics 18. Results: Most respondents felt that mental illness was unlike other illness (78.1%) and most did not trust mentally ill patients in remission to become babysitters (92.7%). However, majority of the respondents disagreed in treating the mentally ill as outcasts (78.1%). Most respondents (85.4%) also agreed that mental health treatment should be provided through community-based facilities where possible. Conclusion: While most respondents displayed a mixed feeling of distrust and fear but they also exhibited tolerance towards preventing stigmatisation and accepting community-based care for the mentally ill. Introduction Attitudes toward mental illness have historically been that of stigmatisation and unfavourable responses (1). However, it was noted in a review article by Ng that attitudes among Asian populations have several distinctions as compared to those in the West. These differences arise because most psychiatric definitions originate in the West, which possess different cultural settings when compared with Asia (2). Several prominent themes that exist among studies conducted in Asia about mental illness have a tendency to display somatisation as a way of dealing with an illness and a greater inclination to attribute mental illness to supernatural or religious phenomena. Conditions that are chronic, relapsing and irreversible are likely to carry a stigma and are judged to be stemming from supernatural or sorcery punishments, social transgressions or constitutional deficits (2). In most Asian societies, family members who are inflicted with mental illness are cared for by the family. While this may lead to a greater sense of shame and stigma, it may also offer potential support and care, which are valuable in the management of psychiatric illnesses. Stigma also has implications for the patient himself, leading to increased psychiatric symptoms and stress, as well as reduced self-esteem. It also reduces the chances of a patient seeking treatment and leads to delays in recovery. Indeed, the stigma of mental illness may even be subjectively worse for the patient than the actual disease (3). Negative attitudes associated with mental illness go beyond mere stigmatisation, in a review by Romer in 2008, studies have shown that the mentally ill are frequently disadvantaged when it comes to matters such as access to housing, employment and health care (3).A review of attitudes toward mental illness in various Asian cultures, conducted by Ng in 1997 also found that differences exist between different Asian ethnicities. In Malaysia, the Malay community was found to be more supportive and less rejecting towards the mentally ill. In more heavily urbanised Singapore, which is predominantly populated by ethnic Chinese, there was a prevailing unsympathetic attitude towards the mentally ill, resulting in many cases of suicide amongst sufferers. The Chinese attitude appears to be consistent with other East Asian cultures, such as the Japanese, who regard a mentally ill relative as a shame to the family (2). There is a dearth of studies performed in Malaysia about attitudes toward the provision of mental healthcare through community facilities. Elsewhere in the world, a study conducted in London in 1995 showed that attitudes toward me
机译:简介:对精神疾病的历史态度一直是污名化之一。这对患者具有严重的影响,因为它在日常生活方面不利于他们,并导致寻求和延误治疗的延迟。目的:本研究的目的是确定马来西亚槟城一个农村社区对精神疾病各个方面以及基于社区的精神卫生设施的态度。资料和方法:马来文版的“社区对精神疾病-瑞典的态度”(CAMI-S)问卷被用作实现这一以道德为本的横断面研究目标的工具。使用PASW Statistics 18对结果进行了描述性分析。结果:大多数受访者认为精神疾病与其他疾病不同(78.1%),并且大多数人不相信精神病患者缓解为保姆(92.7%)。但是,大多数受访者不同意将精神病患者视为流浪者(78.1%)。大多数受访者(85.4%)也同意,应尽可能通过社区机构提供心理健康治疗。结论:虽然大多数受访者表现出不信任和恐惧的混合感觉,但他们也表现出对防止污名化和接受精神病患者的社区护理的容忍度。引言历史上,人们对精神疾病的态度一直是受到侮辱和不良反应(1)。但是,吴在一篇评论文章中指出,与西方人相比,亚洲人之间的态度有几个区别。之所以出现这些差异,是因为大多数精神病学定义起源于西方,与亚洲相比,西方具有不同的文化背景(2)。在亚洲进行的有关精神疾病的研究中,存在几个突出的主题,这些趋势倾向于显示躯体化作为一种​​疾病的治疗方法,并且倾向于将精神疾病归因于超自然或宗教现象。慢性,复发性和不可逆转的疾病很可能带有污名,并被认为是源于超自然的或法术的惩罚,社会犯罪或体质虚弱(2)。在大多数亚洲社会中,患有精神疾病的家庭成员由家庭照料。尽管这可能会带来更大的耻辱感和污名感,但它也可能提供潜在的支持和护理,这在精神疾病的管理中很有价值。柱头对患者本人也有影响,导致精神症状和压力增加,以及自尊心降低。它还减少了患者寻求治疗的机会,并导致康复延迟。的确,精神疾病的耻辱在主观上甚至可能比实际疾病差(3)。罗默(Romer)在2008年的一篇评论中,与精神疾病相关的负面态度已不仅仅是污名化,研究表明,在获得住房,就业和医疗保健等问题上,精神病患者往往处于不利地位(3)。 Ng于1997年对亚洲各种文化对精神疾病的态度进行的调查也发现,不同亚洲种族之间存在差异。在马来西亚,发现马来人社区对精神病患者有更多的支持和拒绝。在城市化程度更高的新加坡(主要是华裔人口)中,普遍存在着对精神病患者的同情态度,导致许多自杀者自杀。中国人的态度似乎与其他东亚文化一致,例如日本人,他们认为精神病患者的亲戚对家庭感到羞耻(2)。在马来西亚,对于通过社区设施提供精神保健的态度尚缺乏研究。在世界其他地方,1995年在伦敦进行的一项研究表明,对我的态度

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号