首页> 外文期刊>The British journal of general practice: the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners >Musculoskeletal clinic in general practice: study of one year's referrals.
【24h】

Musculoskeletal clinic in general practice: study of one year's referrals.

机译:普通的肌肉骨骼诊所:研究一年的转诊。

获取原文
           

摘要

BACKGROUND. A musculoskeletal clinic, staffed by a general practitioner trained in osteopathy, medical acupuncture and intralesional injections, was set up in an inner London general practice in 1987. AIM. A retrospective study was undertaken of one year's referrals to the clinic in 1989-90 to determine how general practitioners were using the clinic in terms of problems referred; consultation patterns of patients attending the clinic and 12 months after initially being seen; and how access to the clinic influenced referrals to relevant hospital departments. METHOD. Day sheets were studied which recorded information on demographic characteristics of patients referred to the clinic and their problems, diagnoses made, duration of symptoms, number and range of treatments given, and recurrence of problems. Use of secondary referral sources was also examined. RESULTS. During the study year 154 of 3264 practice patients were referred to the musculoskeletal clinic, and attended a mean of 3.5 times each. Of all the attenders 64% were women and 52% were 30-54 years old. Eighty one patients (53%) presented with neck, back or sciatic pain. A specific traumatic, inflammatory or other pathological process could be ascribed to only 19% of patients. Regarding treatment, 88% of patients received osteopathic manual treatment or acupuncture, or a combination of these treatments and 4% received intralesional injections. Nine patients from the clinic (6%) were referred to an orthopaedic specialist during the year, two with acute back pain. Referrals to orthopaedic specialists by the practice as a whole were not significantly lower than the national average, although the practice made fewer referrals to physiotherapy and rheumatology departments than national figures would have predicted. Seventeen patients (11%) returned to the clinic with a recurrence of their main complaint within a year of their initial appointment; second courses of treatment were usually brief. CONCLUSION. The clinic encouraged a relatively low referral rate to musculoskeletal specialists outside the practice. However, a need was identified for better communication about the potential of the approaches used in order that referrals to secondary specialists, particularly orthopaedic specialists, could be further reduced.
机译:背景。 1987年,伦敦内部一家普通诊所开设了一家肌肉骨骼诊所,由一名接受过整骨疗法,针灸和病灶内注射培训的全科医生组成。回顾性研究了1989-90年一年转诊到诊所的情况,以确定全科医师如何根据所提到的问题使用诊所。初诊后12个月内到诊所就诊的患者的咨询方式;以及进入诊所的方式如何影响转介到相关医院部门。方法。研究了记录表,记录了关于转诊至诊所的患者的人口统计学特征及其问题,做出的诊断,症状的持续时间,给予的治疗的次数和范围以及问题复发的信息。还检查了二级推荐来源的使用。结果。在研究年度中,有3264名练习患者中的154名被转诊到肌肉骨骼诊所,平均每次参加3.5次。在所有参加者中,有64%是女性,而52%是30-54岁。 81位患者(53%)出现颈部,背部或坐骨痛。特定的创伤,炎性或其他病理过程仅可归因于19%的患者。关于治疗,88%的患者接受了骨病性手动治疗或针灸,或这些治疗的组合,而4%的患者接受了病灶内注射。一年中,诊所的9名患者(6%)被转诊至骨科专家,其中2名患有急性背痛。从整体上看,转诊给骨科专家的人数并没有显着低于全国平均水平,尽管该做法转诊给理疗和风湿病科的人数少于国家的数字。在初次就诊后的一年内,有17名患者(11%)因主诉复发而返回诊所;第二疗程通常简短。结论。诊所鼓励在实践之外向肌肉骨骼专家推荐相对较低的转诊率。但是,已确定需要就所使用方法的潜力进行更好的沟通,以便可以进一步减少转介二级专家,尤其是骨科专家。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号