首页> 外文期刊>The British journal of general practice: the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners >General practitioners' attitudes to the development of midwifery group practices.
【24h】

General practitioners' attitudes to the development of midwifery group practices.

机译:全科医生对助产小组实践发展的态度。

获取原文
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: The report Changing childbirth (1993) has led to the development of midwifery-led schemes that aim to increase the continuity of maternity care. AIM: To determine the impact of midwifery group practices on the work of general practitioners (GPs) and their perceptions of midwifery group practice care. METHOD: Postal questionnaires were sent to 58 GPs referring women to the care of midwifery group practices (group-practice GPs), and a shorter questionnaire was sent to the remaining 67 GPs (non-group-practice GPs) within the same postcode area as a comparison group. In-depth interviews were conducted with 12 GPs. RESULTS: Questionnaires were returned by 71% of group-practice GPs and 81% of non-group practice GPs. One third of the group practice GPs felt that they were seeing group practice women too few times, and 50% thought midwives discouraged women from visiting their GP for antenatal checks. Over 80% of group practice GPs believed that midwives had the skills to detect deviation from the normal, and 66% would confidently refer women to their care. However, only 14% of group practice GPs believed that their own role was clear, while 64% agreed that communication with group practice midwives was poor, and concerns were expressed about the level of consultation before establishing schemes. Of the non-group practice GPs, 87% said they would consider referring women to the care of a midwifery group practice in the future. CONCLUSIONS: General practitioners were generally positive about the quality of care provided by midwifery group practices but identified issues that require addressing in developing this model of care.
机译:背景:《改变分娩》(1993年)的报告促使以助产士为主导的计划的发展,旨在提高产妇保健的连续性。目的:确定助产小组实践对全科医生(GP)工作的影响及其对助产小组实践护理的看法。方法:将邮政问卷发送给58位全科医生,让妇女照料助产小组做法(小组练习GP),并向与该邮编相同地区的其余67名全科医生(非小组练习GP)发送一份较短的问卷。一个比较组。与12名GP进行了深入访谈。结果:71%的团体执业GP和81%的非团体执业GP返回问卷调查表。小组执业全科医生的三分之一认为他们看到小组执业女性的次数太少了,有50%的人认为助产士不鼓励妇女去GP进行产前检查。超过80%的团体执业全科医生相信助产士具有检测偏离正常水平的技能,而66%的助产士会自信地将妇女转介给她们。但是,只有14%的团体执业医生认为自己的角色很明确,而64%的人则认为与团体执业助产士的沟通很差,并且对建立计划之前的咨询水平表示担忧。在非团体执业全科医生中,有87%的人表示,他们将来会考虑将妇女转介至助产士团体执业。结论:全科医生对助产士团体提供的护理质量普遍持肯定态度,但确定了在开发这种护理模式时需要解决的问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号