【24h】

Proceed with caution: authors’ response

机译:谨慎行事:作者的回应

获取原文
           

摘要

In the December issue Iliffe1 assured us that our article ‘anticipatory care of older patients represented the triumph of hope over experience’.2 We find this a bewildering claim in view of the extensive research evidence to the contrary. No less than six controlled trials between 1979 and 1993 showed that a programme of care, tailored to the special needs of those in advanced old age, reduced the time spent in institutional care (hospitals and nursing homes). They are referenced in our book.3 In addition Beswick in 2008, a much more recent meta-analysis than that cited by Iliffe,4 has made a thorough appraisal of nearly all the research work done in this field. From 89 studies he showed that interventions reduced the risk of not living at home, of nursing-home and hospital admissions and falls. However death rates were not reduced.
机译:在12月刊中,Iliffe1向我们保证,我们的文章“老年患者的预期护理代表了对经验的希望之胜”。2鉴于大量相反的研究证据,我们发现这令人困惑。 1979年至1993年之间,至少进行了六次对照试验,结果表明,针对高龄者的特殊需求而制定的护理方案减少了机构护理(医院和疗养院)的时间。它们在我们的书中得到了引用。3除了Beswick,在2008年,比Iliffe [4]引用的更新的荟萃分析对该领域几乎所有的研究工作都进行了全面的评估。从89项研究中,他表明,干预措施降低了不在家,养老院和医院住院以及跌倒的风险。但是死亡率没有降低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号